Preferred bidder in Manchester United takeover could be named by end of the week

Sir Jim Ratcliffe and Sheikh Jassim are both in the running to purchase the club

Miguel Delaney
Chief Football Writer
Wednesday 24 May 2023 07:43 BST
Comments
Takeover talk ramps up at Manchester United as Glazers face increased fan pressure

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Bidders for Manchester United are hopeful there will be an announcement regarding a preferred bidder by the close of the domestic season, and potentially as early as Friday this week.

Although that is already much later than expected, and will bring some more clarity, sources with knowledge of the situation are describing it as "another milestone of constant milestones" in a process that could yet go on months.

There has been "cautious optimism" within the INEOS bid due to the nature of the deal they put together, which still has the club priced at a higher value than Qatar's. While the Sheikh Jassim-fronted bid did come in with a twist fourth offer after the supposed deadline for final bids had passed, and it was significantly improved on the third offer, it did not "blow Sir Jim Ratcliffe out of the water" – to use the phrase so commonly uttered in this process. It is also seen by some sources as an acknowledgement that the third offer was surprisingly low.

The reporting of that did lead to a situation where there was some frustration with the Qatar bid and damaged relations, due to what one figure describes as "an attempt to brief their way to a better bid than they actually put in". Last week's offer, however, is at least considered to be competitive against Ratcliffe's. Issues like tension or damaged relations are not seen as particularly influential, though, as this will come down to the hard numbers.

That is nevertheless still dependent on the perspective of the numbers. Both the bidders have been arguing about how their offers are "cleaner" than the other, albeit from different sides. INEOS have been pointing to how theirs will not involve as lengthy a process through the Owners and Directors test, due to the fact it has no complications about state ownership. Meanwhile, the Jassim bid insist their bid is private, although the widespread belief is that it is ultimately backed by Qatar.

That comes amid growing aggravation within the other Premier League clubs about state ownership, particularly in light of the long delay on the Manchester City case – where the club has been charged 115 times for alleged breaches of Financial Fair Play rules – and chief executive Richard Masters' refusal to comment on whether the competition is investigating whether Newcastle United's owners broke "legally binding assurances" on being separate to the Saudi Arabian state. It is expected that if Qatar was to be the preferred bidder, there would be fierce opposition from at least 17 clubs.

The Jassim bid are meanwhile arguing that their offer can be negotiated more quickly, due to the fact it is for all of the Glazers’ shares and an outright buy-out.

The hope among bidders is that there will be clarity on this by Friday.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in