England stutter in Denmark stalemate as Gareth Southgate’s search to fulfil squad’s talent continues
Denmark 0-0 England: The Three Lions remained unbeaten from two Nations League games
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.England fall behind Belgium in the Nations League group, but a more pressing concern is whether England are falling behind the major nations in terms of approach.
This was the major question from a mostly drab 0-0 draw with Denmark, of otherwise minor consequence and strange context. It would be nice to win the Nations League, of course, but the nature of the competition - and the curious Covid-19 context of this match - means it is largely rife for experimentation. This, however, is one of the issues.
It doesn’t so much feel like Southgate is experimenting, as trying to work out his best team - and especially his best midfield. He looks no closer to solutions.
There are genuine questions there, not least regarding the cautious mindset of the line-ups, and some of the selections.
The biggest is whether Southgate will put out a team that actually makes this hugely talented squad any way better than the sum of their parts. It is no idle question, either.
Southgate has been immensely impressive in many parts of this job, especially as regards psychology, which is so crucial with the biggest international team.Although the starting central duo of Kalvin Phillips and Declan Rice was predictably pedestrian, it might have worked if there was a real playmaker in front of them. Phil Foden was even more conspicuous by his absence in that regard, but Southgate does have other options. He eventually brought two of them on, in Jack Grealish and Mason Mount. That was only after a whole lot of nothing - not least the space between these two key positions.
Kane is said to fancy himself as more of a No 10 than a striker, which made it all the more curious that he spent so much of the game so far forward. That had the effect of pushing Raheem Sterling and Jadon Sancho further wide, to occasionally get in the way of Trent Alexander-Arnold and Kieran Trippier. And those very names raise the side question of why he selected three right-backs but no left-back.
The next was why the line-up as a whole had so many defensive-minded players, against a team that England are better than, and should be imposing their game on.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments