Stoke owners in bid for Port Vale

Phil Shaw
Saturday 01 February 2003 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

After 127 years' history, and with no sign of Robbie Williams riding to the rescue on a black-and-white charger, Port Vale's continued existence may rest with the six club chairmen and one MP that comprise the Football League's board, after the company that owns Stoke City made the highest offer for the cash-strapped Second Division club.

The Stoke chairman, Gunnar Gislason, insisted his club had no intention of taking over Vale but added, perhaps significantly, that he could not speak for Stoke Holding, the company set up by the Icelandic consortium that bought control of Stoke in 1999. He believed a future merger made "financial sense".

Vale supporters' groups and rival bidders fear that Stoke Holding wants to buy Vale with the intention of selling Vale Park for housing and using the money to shore up Stoke's future. Vale are in administration with debts of £2.4m.

Under the Icelandic proposals, the Burslem club would either be merged with Stoke – whose debts are around three times the size of Vale's – or share their First Division neighbours' ground. Vale's support, currently averaging 4,300, is concentrated in the north end of Stoke-on-Trent (the smallest English city to boast two League teams). Stoke's Britannia Stadium is in the south, leading many Vale supporters to argue that a takeover would mean the death of their club.

Stoke Holding must convince the League directors that its bid does not breach the rule barring one club from being involved, directly or indirectly, in running another. The committee that will consider Stoke Holding's offer is led by the new League chairman, the former Tory minister Sir Brian Mawhinney. He is joined by David Sheepshanks (Ipswich chairman), Theo Paphitis (Millwall), Barry Hearn (Leyton Orient), Terry Robinson (Sheffield United), Ivor Beeks (Wycombe) and Peter Heard (Colchester).

The three other offers come from organisations or individuals pledging to keep Vale at their home of 53 years. Bill Bratt, for the fan-based Valiant 2001 consortium, said: "You only have to look at Stoke's monetary problems and how they treated the manager [Gudjon Thordarson] who got them promoted. This must be stopped."

John Simmonds, of the Sproson Trust supporters' group, said: "It's a calculated plan to create one club in the city and put Port Vale out of business."

Jeff Kent, of the Save the Vale fund, said: "It's hard to believe anyone could come up with such a crass idea."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in