Chelsea vs Man City: Manuel Pellegrini set to give youth a chance against Blues, but says ‘I wouldn’t pay for a ticket’
Manager set to rest stars with hectic schedule coming up
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.For a manager about to give a batch of young players their first big chance today, Manuel Pellegrini didn’t exactly offer the greatest endorsement of what should be a big match, both on its own terms and for the future of Manchester City. His words were actually rather remarkable when asked if the FA Cup fifth-round tie with Chelsea is a “real game”.
“I think it’s not a real game, of course,” Pellegrini said. “I would not pay for the ticket. We told [the fans] one week ago that we are going to play with a young team. If the people want to continue going to the stadium, or Chelsea fans will enjoy that game, I don’t know.”
Pellegrini’s curmudgeonly attitude is an extension of City’s understandable frustration with fixture scheduling that sees them play an FA Cup tie three days before an awkward Champions League trip to Dynamo Kiev, but it’s still hard not to wonder whether he could show more public belief in his young players.
The other side of this anger is that academy graduates like Bersant Celina could experience the type of jubilation that Bertrand Traore (right) did in scoring his first goal for Chelsea last weekend, against Newcastle. “It’s a joy for him,” Hiddink said. “It’s beautiful.”
That felt like it had the potential to be a breakthrough moment, given how intent Chelsea are in finally producing another long-term youth graduate to succeed John Terry. Except, Hiddink immediately indicated there could be more waiting. “Putting one of the youngsters in, that depends on the demands of the FA Cup, but I don’t hesitate putting him in if needed.”
It is that immediate need, however, that so often imposes on longer-term plans regarding youth. This FA Cup match actually sums up so many of the problems that the modern elite have in bringing through homegrown players, especially since it is a meeting between two clubs who have been more concerned with that than anyone else in Europe. In the last year, leading executives from both City and Chelsea privately spoke at length to the Independent on Sunday about how much they want their own homegrown cores.
Putting their money where their mouths are, the two clubs have spent fortunes in making their academies the best in the game, as they try and underlay relatively new regimes with the type of identity that only a strong youth set-up can give.
Despite that, it is ironic that you can’t buy the readiness required to make the “most difficult step” - as Hiddink calls it – from youth to the full team. You can only put the conditions in place. The two clubs have done all that - apart from maybe the last condition.
With the modern perception of the FA Cup, this should be a perfect platform to give young players the chance to breathe.Pellegrini is complaining about having to play youth. Hiddink is effectively saying he cannot because the club’s priorities this season have changed - but all of this keeps undercutting those longer-term priorities.
For the last decade, Chelsea’s target has been to bring one academy player into the first team every two years. That has not happened once. “We’re not concerned,” one source says. “We are frustrated. It’s the dilemma.”
City are still “relaxed” rather than frustrated, given they are five years behind Chelsea in the process. Senior club figures told the Independent last week that they would expect it to take another three years for the academy to properly produce fruit.
The wonder is whether they’ll have the same view if, like Chelsea, they go through four successive FA Youth Cup winning teams without a senior player. The demands at the top level also mean it’s become commonplace to buy players , rather than allow young recruits to find their feet.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments