The Independent's journalism is supported by our readers. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn commission.
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The debate has been raging for almost a decade.
Seemingly nothing can separate Lionel Messi and Cristiano Ronaldo, two of the best players to ever play the game of football.
Both have comparable goal scoring records, both have won numerous titles and both have a number of individual honours.
In fact, the only real way to separate them seems to be by personal opinion, or by their form over recent weeks.
After Barcelona's win against Real Madrid everyone thinks Messi is the best in the world again, but back in October when Real Madrid dominated Barca on their way to a 3-1 win, Ronaldo ruled the roost.
But now The Economist has entered the row and seemingly found an answer to the question of who is better.
In a nutshell, their argument is thus: "... not all goals are created equal: their value depends entirely on the context in which they occur. Some land in the 90th minute of a 1-1 tie and secure a win all by themselves; others are tacked on at the same point in a match once a team is already up 3-1."
The full article argues that scoring the winning goal in a tightly contested match is of more value than a bonus goal with your side already heavily up - and that over the last two years (their sample size) Messi's goals have been 'worth' a lot more than Ronaldo's, even though the Portuguese has scored 105 to the Argentinian's 86 (goals from La Liga, Champions League and the World Cup).
Using their 'EPA' metric, Expected Points Added, which boils down the minute a goal is scored, the importance of the match and the context of the match (whether the goal was important) into a percentage and then a single number, each of Messi's goals are worth more - 59.5 EPA, compared to 50.4 for Ronaldo.
The article stipulates that goal scoring, of course, is not the only aspect of a match that decides its outcome, defensive play and the ability to create for team-mates has not been taken into account.
But from a purely goalscoring perspective, it would appear that Messi has the upper hand, even if on paper it appears as if Ronaldo has scored more in recent years.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments