Is Jamie Vardy a 'cheat' for the part he played in Samir Nasri's red-card?

Was Vardy right to exaggerate contact after Nasri made light contact with him? Here, two Independent Sport writers have their say on whether Vardy's actions should be criticised or not

Should Vardy be celebrated for his role in Leicester's triumph? Or castigated? (Getty)

Samir Nasri has labelled Jamie Vardy a 'cheat' and accused the Leicester City striker of failing to 'act like a man', after his role in the Sevilla attacking midfielder's sending-off on Tuesday night.

Nasri was shown a second yellow card by referee Daniele Orsato after appearing to butt heads with Vardy, who peeled away from the incident claiming to have been hurt.

The 29-year-old former France international was furious with Vardy's reaction to the clash of heads and had to be ushered off the pitch by his teammates.

“For me he’s a cheat because if he was a foreign player, you the English press would be saying he’s a cheat. For me he is a cheat,“ Nasri said. ”They were winning 2-0. Play the game like a man. You are not better than us but you are winning 2-0 and will qualify, just play the game.“

But was Vardy right to exaggerate the contact in order to get Nasri sent-off? Our chief sports writer Ian Herbert and sports reporter Luke Brown have their say...

Disgraceful act takes the sheen of Leicester's accomplishment

Vardy should be ashamed of his role in Nasri's red-card? (Getty)

For once, it was more than a case of the footballer losing it in a moment of juvenile fury. Samir Nasri’s rage really did have a component of rationale and genuine indignation about it.

He was sent off 20 minutes before the end of Sevilla’s defeat to Leicester and yet as the players processed off he was waiting near the dressing rooms for Jamie Vardy, determined to have this thing out with him. He was prevented from doing so. The home team’s French Arab players, Riyad Mahrez and Islam Slimani saw him, wandered up, and walked him away from a possible flashpoint. It had been Slimani who had reasoned with Nasri as he refused to walk off the pitch.

Nasri is not generally a defensible character because he has that uncanny knack of behaving like an idiot. He Spanish drug testing authorities are currently in no rush to rule on whether he broke doping rules by visiting the Los Angeles intravenous therapy clinic ‘Drip Doctors.’

But there were two sides to the story this time and Nasri’s is the convincing one. For over 18 months now, we have become more accustomed to that habit – evident again on Tuesday – of Vardy hooking out a leg to ensure a defender or goalkeeper catches it and clips him, so winning a free-kick. If every act of simulation brought a caution, Vardy would have been the one taking an early walk on Tuesday night.

And that was before the impression of a man touching a 1,000 volt cable he gave after the French player brought his head down to Vardy’s. Contrary to some of the stories doing the rounds on Wednesday, Vardy had not repeatedly insulted the midfielder’s family. Nasri's testimony revealed that he had spoken first after the off-the-ball shove on him from Vardy which the cameras picked up. But as game-turning devices go, it was, frankly, a disgrace: an act which takes the sheen off Leicester’s accomplishment. And yes – Nasri is most certainly right in his assessment of the incident which is published on Thursday: if a foreign player had employed such a strategy against any British club’s player, he would be condemned the length and breadth of the country.

A furious Nasri waited in the tunnel to confront Vardy (Getty)

Gamesmanship in football is as old as the hills. When Liverpool and Nottingham Forest were England’s standard bearers in the 1970s and 1980s, they would spot a physically weak opponent and bully him out of the game. Liverpool once got a taste of their own medicine when the two sides faced each other in a 1979 tie, and Terry McDermott was silenced by Forest’s hard men. Almost all of that was sneaky – a surreptitious kick here or there when no-one was looking. But there was no squealing. You dished it out and you took it back.

In very many ways, Tuesday night in Leicester was a throwback to those great European Cup years, with an atmosphere which Manchester City and Arsenal fans could do worse than witness. Champions League nights in their grounds can’t carry a torch to the atmosphere on what some around the east Midlands club were on Wednesday describing as the very best night – if not the best – in the club’s history. To a man, the jubilant players stopped to talk as they processed out, though not Vardy. He knew what he had done. Ian Herbert.

Vardy would have been a fool not to go down

Would Nasri have stayed on his feet if Vardy had butted him? (Getty)

Earlier this season, Raheem Sterling failed to go to the ground when shoved in the penalty area by Kyle Walker during Manchester City’s 2-2 draw with Tottenham. When asked about the incident after the match, Yaya Toure did not even attempt to hide his disappointment in his younger team-mate.

“He is too honest,” Toure sighed. “He wants to be proper in these sort of games. But if you have a bit of experience, like me, you would maybe dive in that situation. That’s what you have to do.”

Toure’s point was a simple one: Sterling may want to be honest and proper in the spotlight’s glare, but his primary allegiance is to his team-mates, rather than his reputation or his sense of fair-play. Instead, Sterling had revealed his naivety by staying on his feet, costing his club all three points.

Vardy put the interests of his team first (Getty)

Jamie Vardy could have cost his club much, much more than three points had he not made the most of Samir Nasri’s impetuous jerk of the head in Leicester’s 2-0 win against Sevilla in the Champions League. The Frenchman had been Sevilla’s best player until that point but allowed his frustration to get the better of him when he retaliated to Vardy’s light shove as the pair jostled for position.

Only the most partisan of Leicester supporters would argue Vardy did not make the most of it. Indeed, Vardy demonstrated significantly greater resilience when he went on to punch himself in the face several times after shooting over the bar moments later. But there was no shame in his decision to exaggerate the contact, and he should not be castigated for choosing to do so. A failure to exaggerate the contact would have been a failure to capitalise on an advantage. Almost any other player on the pitch would have done the same.

The forward angrily punched himself in the face after the Nasri incident (Getty)

After all Nasri, let us not forget, has his own history when it comes to simulation and has been publicly criticised by Harry Redknapp, Tony Pulis and Steve Bruce for diving to win penalties while at Arsenal and Manchester City. Does Nasri’s frustration over this particular incident really stem from Vardy ‘not acting like a man?’ Or rather from the fact that Vardy collapsed to the turf before him?

An understandably aggrieved Nasri has also suggested that Vardy has escaped condemnation for his actions because he is British, whereas a foreign player would be no doubt vilified. Can the opposite argument not also be made?

Nasri has himself been accused of simulation in the past (Getty)

Luis Suárez, for one, appears to have a far more flexible interpretation of the rules than Vardy. And Suárez cheated in a far more blatant fashion when he dived in the box to win Barcelona the penalty which led to their fifth goal, in their 6-5 aggregate victory over PSG last week. His dive did little to dampen the hysteric appreciation of that result, so why should Vardy’s in any way dampen Leicester’s achievement, as equally remarkable but for so many different reasons?

One more thing: Nasri’s angry claim that Vardy had failed to play football ‘like a man’ rankles when simulation remains a comparative rarity in the women’s game. Just another example of how Nasri’s bitter post-match rant should not be taken seriously and should not detract in any way from the scale of Leicester’s achievement. Luke Brown