Flamengo blame ‘provocative refereeing’ for Club World Cup defeat
Flamengo were stunned by Saudi Arabian club Al Hilal in their Club World Cup semi final
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Flamengo manager Vitor Pereira blamed his side’s stunning 3-2 loss to Saudi Arabia’s Al Hilal in Club World Cup semi-final on Tuesday on the refereeing, which according to the Portuguese manager, was one sided.
Al Hilal won thanks to two penalties from Salem Al Dawsari and a close-range strike from Luciano Vietto in a second-half in which Flamengo were down to 10 men after midfielder Gerson conceded the second penalty and was sent off in first-half stoppage time.
“We were ready to play Al Hilal but were not ready for a refereeing that was not up to the standards of the competition,” Pereira told a news conference at Tangier on Tuesday.
“There was a very big lack of criteria, it was provocative refereeing and if it weren’t for the personality of our players, I’m convinced that we would end the game with more red cards.”
Pereira suggested that the referee didn’t take a stand to stop Al Hilal players milking the clock and had different criteria for bookings. Flamengo were shown four yellow cards in the first half and three in the second while Al Hilal received only three bookings.
“He was permissive with one stop after the other,” Pereira said.
“Al Hilal’s only goal attempts in the first-half were the penalties. Therefore, if the match ended 11 against 11, we were the better side.
“We took the actions but were unable to translate it into goals. In the second half, with one less, it wasn’t apathy, it’s difficult to play down one man.”
Al Hilal coach Ramon Diaz disagreed with Pereira and said the penalties were well spotted by the referee.
“Flamengo was surprised by our quality and by how prepared we were, mentally and strategically,” Diaz told a news conference.
“Flamengo didn’t expect that we would change our scheme from a 4-3-3 to a 4-4-1-1, with Luciano Vietto as an attacking midfielder.
“Vietto ghosted behind their holding midfielders who we identified were not good on challenges. And he was brilliant, suffering both penalties and scoring a great goal for us.”
Al Hilal, the first Saudi side to reach the Club World Cup final, will face the winners of Real Madrid’s semi-final against Al Ahly on Wednesday in Rabat.
Flamengo became only the fourth Brazilian side and sixth South American champions to lose a Club World Cup semi-final.
Reuters
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments