Football: FA's code of conduct completely toothless
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE FOOTBALL Association has unveiled a new draft code of conduct designed to be a "benchmark for behaviour" in the game - yet admit that there are no powers to enforce it.
The code, meant to be adhered to be everyone in the game, was drawn up in the wake of Sir John Smith's report to the FA into the values, finances and reputation of football.
Several developments are already being put in place:
A compliance officer will be appointed within two months to oversee issues of financial irregularities, drug abuse, racism and violent play, with a shortlist of 10 lawyers, police officers and people with a criminal justice background drawn up.
Disciplinary processes will be modernised to tighten up disciplinary laws so that challenges such as Tottenham's to their initial 12-point penalty a few years ago cannot reoccur, as well as ensuring that players can be summoned to the FA to assist with inquiries.
A financial advisory unit is also being established to give information to clubs.
Following on from those announcements, the FA yesterday published the terms of its draft code of conduct as the fourth plank of Sir John's recommendations.
It calls for football to take community feeling into account when making decisions, to set a positive example to young people, to wipe out corruption and to reject violence and discrimination. Yet the code is only meant to run alongside existing disciplinary rules which can lead to misconduct hearings, a sort of highway code of do's and don'ts and there are no penalties for breaking it.
The FA company secretary, Nick Coward, said: "Sir John identified the lack of a statement of aspirations for the game, the lack of an ethical football policy. This is a set of values for people that they should have regard to when making decisions. We are dealing with the grey areas."
However, the bottom line is that even if Manchester United's proposed takeover by BSkyB was found to contradict the statement on community feeling, nothing could happen. Toothless is then a fair description.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments