Football: Blissett faced with 'ample evidence'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE JURY considering the case of the Brentford footballer, Gary Blissett, accused of assaulting Torquay United's John Uzzell during a Third Division game last year will retire this morning to consider its verdict.
Blissett, 28, has denied a prosecution allegation that he 'cynically and deliberately' thrust his elbow into the face of Uzzell, who has not played professional football since the incident, as the two jumped for a high ball in the game at Torquay last December.
Judge David MacLaren Webster yesterday told the jury that professional football was not for the faint-hearted - it was not tiddlywinks or croquet on the vicarage lawn but a vigorous, hard-contested contact sport. Accidents were expected and did happen, but what was not accepted by those involved, nor by the law, was the deliberate or intentional infliction of injury.
The jury has seen video recordings of the incident which resulted in Uzzell having an operation after receiving a fractured cheekbone and a fractured eye-socket floor.
Blissett, who has denied a charge of causing grievous bodily harm, has told the jury that what happened had been an accident as the two players went for a 50-50 ball.
Andrew Chubb, for the prosecution, said there was 'ample evidence' to show he had committed an unlawful act. 'Mr Blissett, realising he was not going to win the ball, kept that elbow raised so that, although his body appears to turn away from Mr Uzzell, his momentum rammed that elbow into Mr Uzzell's cheek.'
David Green, defending, said it had been reasonable for the Brentford striker to go for the ball, and when it became apparent the challenge had been won by Mr Uzzell, Blissett had turned away.
'It is false for the prosecution to say Blissett should have dropped his arms at that stage. We are talking about fractions of a second.'
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments