Football: Africa risk a split World Cup vote
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Football: Africa risk a split World Cup vote
South Africa's chances of staging the 2006 World Cup are coming under increasing threat because of the refusal of Africa's four other candidates - Egypt, Morocco, Ghana and Nigeria - to withdraw from the running, writes Matthew Joseph. With only six weeks to go before the interim deadline for firm commitments to be made to Fifa by prospective candidates, South Africa's rivals have failed to bow to pressure to unite behind a sole African bid. South African officials will step up their efforts in the next few weeks to persuade the other countries to stand down, but if they fail, South Africa runs the risk of a damaging split vote in March next year when the 2006 venue is decided. Meanwhile, Fifa are to introduce random out-of-competition drug testing at an as yet unspecified date. The world governing body have agreed to fund a massive anti-doping programme targeting friendly internationals and training camps.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments