England re-entry stymied by deal

Rugunion David Llewellyn
Thursday 08 August 1996 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

They never said it was going to be easy sorting out the mess that was the Five Nations, but it would now appear that the Rugby Football Union is caught between the rock of its legally binding contract and some hard cases in the other four unions.

Tom Kiernan, the chairman of the Five Nations committee, said last night that Twickenham's latest proposals to get back their place in the tournament were unacceptable. Last month England were thrown out after completing their own pounds 87.5m five-year deal with BSkyB.

The other unions want the RFU to make some radical changes to their arrangements with the satellite television broadcaster. Otherwise the four will go ahead with their own championship, to the exclusion of England.

Twickenham came up with some proposals, which were considered by the gang of four earlier this week, and it was announced that a letter would be sent to the RFU president, John Richardson, within 48 hours.

Kiernan said: "The proposal made by England was not in keeping with the suggestions made by the four countries at the Cardiff meeting last month. We have therefore responded to the RFU president, John Richardson, indicating precisely where improvements need to be made.

"While our position with regard to England's re-entry into the tournament has not changed, we are still hoping an agreement can be reached prior to us making the necessary commercial and administrative arrangements for the new competition later this month."

Although the 48 hours has elapsed, an RFU spokesperson said no letter has yet been received. "We haven't seen the letter, so we don't know what the improvements are that have been suggested by the other unions. As soon as John Richardson sees the letter and has had time to consider its contents then he will be able to respond."

The stance of the other unions has remained constant throughout, and it appears that England will have to make considerable amendments to their contract with BSkyB before they can satisfy their erstwhile Five Nations colleagues.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in