Edberg bids gracious farewell

John Roberts Tennis Correspondent
Thursday 27 June 1996 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

JOHN ROBERTS

Tennis Correspondent

Stefan Edberg did not bid farewell on some sunny afternoon on the Centre Court, but shortly before 9pm in gathering gloom on No 1 Court, which is also due for retirement this year.

At least the champion of 1988 and 1990 was given a rousing send-off after gracing the lawns with his elegant style for 14 consecutive years. And if it hurt to lose in the second round to a Swedish compatriot, the 24- year-old Mikael Tillstrom, he did not let it show.

Tillstrom, ranked No 58 in the world, has not played at Wimbledon since he was a junior, but he held his nerve after losing the opening set to defeat the No 12 seed, 4-6, 6-4, 7-6, 6-4. Edberg's prospects began to fade when he lost a 4-2 lead in the third-set tie-break, which Tillstrom went on to win, 7-5.

Scarcely seen at Grand Slam championships chiefly because of injuries, Tillstrom made his mark at the Australian Open in January, losing to Michael Chang in the quarter-finals after defeating Thomas Muster in the previous round.

Edberg characteristically gave his opponent credit. "Mikael played very well," he said. "I had a lot of support and I did my best, but it was not good enough today.''

Having lost the honorary Brit, what are our prospects for the remainder of the tournament?

As Terry Venables said in another arena, we must accentuate the positive. Britain has two men in the third round, and, since Tim Henman and Luke Milligan are playing each other today, the nation will be represented in the last 16 for the fifth year consecutively.

The five other hopefuls, including Greg Rusedski, who carried the flag last year, perished in the second round, but we have been taught not to be greedy.

Celebrate, instead, the fact that Henman versus Milligan marks the first occasion in the Open era that two British men will have played each other in the third round.

Step back in amazement on learning that it will be the first time two British men will have met on the Centre Court since Monday 20 June, 1938, when Bunny Austin defeated Eric Filby and went on to become the last British finalist in the men's singles.

Rusedski, on Court No 14, served 30 aces but was eliminated by Brett Steven, who had also beaten him in their two previous meetings, on hard courts. On this occasion, the New Zealander won, 7-6, 4-6, 7-6, 6-2, Rusedski almost double-faulting himself to distraction in the third-set tie-break, which he lost, 12-14.

Mark Petchey was no match for Cedric Pioline, the No 16 seed, but he was at least given the opportunity to pay his respects to No 1 Court. The Frenchman won, 6-1, 6-4, 6-2, which surprised no one who recalled his stupendous quarter-final against Boris Becker last year, which he lost, 9-7 in the fifth set.

Chris Wilkinson seemed likely to create something of a national record for consistency by advancing the third round four years in a row, but he was unable to build on a bright start against Jan Kroslak, of Slovakia. Kroslak recovered from a set and a break down to prevail, 1-6, 7-5, 5- 7, 6-4, 6-3.

Since Colin Beecher had fallen to Italy's Renzo Furlan the day before, that left Danny Sapsford, who could only have prospered at Henman's expense. The 27-year-old from Surrey merely detained the nation's top man on Court No 1.

Their match had been suspended on Wednesday because of bad light, with Henman leading, 6-1, 5-5. When play resumed, Sapsford was quicker into his stride, winning a second set tie-break, 7-3, and treating us to a superb lob on the final point.

That was about it for our Danny. Henman won the next 11 games before Sapsford produced his first two aces to briefly interrupt his opponent. Henman won, 6-1, 6-7, 6-0, 6-1, requiring only 55 minutes on the day.

This was fortunate, considering that Henman had not had a day off since commencing the tournament on Tuesday with that spectacular five-set triumph against Russia's Yevgeny Kafelnikov, the French Open champion and fifth seed.

No peace for the successful. Henman is due back on court today to face Milligan, who needed all the rest he could get yesterday after almost collapsing from cramp during his marathon match against Nicolas Lapentti, of Ecuador, on Wednesday.

Overworked or not, it will be a proud moment for the 21-year-old from Oxford and his family when he steps on to the Centre Court this afternoon. His grandfather, Henry Billington, reached the third round on three occasions: 1948, 1950 and 1951.

Pete Sampras, who is attempting to win the title four times consecutively, demonstrated to a mighty young Australian, Mark Philippoussis, that there is much more to grass-court tennis than hitting big serves.

The 19-year-old Philippoussis almost blew Sampras off the rubberised concrete court when they met in the third round of the Australian Open in January, and hit 28 aces on the Centre Court yesterday, 20 of them by the seventh game of the second set.

Moreover, he hit the fastest recorded serve of the tournament (131 mph), and a second serve of 126 mph. But Sampras still won handily, 7-6, 6-4, 6-4, which prompted Philippoussis to observe, "I think Pete was definitely determined for revenge, to let everyone know that maybe the last time I beat him it was a bit of a fluke or something.''

That was no fluke, but Sampras has learned from a dodgy introduction to the lawns that the return of serve is the key to success, and the lesson appears to be sinking in early for the big Aussie - one Greek's gift to another.

More reports, results, page 27

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in