David Walsh admits he no longer trusts Chris Froome as he used to in wake of adverse drugs test at Vuelta a Espana
Walsh has been a long-time defender of Froome’s reputation
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.David Walsh, the journalist who played a crucial role in uncovering Lance Amrstrong’s doping programme, has admitted he no longer trusts Chris Froome as he used to.
Walsh has been a long-time defender of Froome’s reputation in the face of years of speculation about the cyclist and Team Sky’s commitment to their clean-riding mantra.
But he said that in the wake of Froome testing for double the permitted limit of the asthma drug Salbutamol during the Vuelta a Espana, which Froome went on to win, that “it leaves [Froome] with a question that will take some answering”.
“There is a threshold level and Froome exceeded that by 100%,” Walsh wrote in the Sunday Times. “He has to explain how that amount of Salbutamol got into his body. If the authorities are not satisfied, he will be banned and stripped of his Vuelta a Espana title.
“The greater punishment will be to his reputation... he will be seriously damaged. Four Tour de France victories diminished in one asterisk.”
Walsh said he spoke to Froome for an hour on Friday evening in a “fraught, difficult conversation” in which the rider reiterated his innocence. When Walsh suggested he should have accepted responsibility when he was informed of the test result in September, Froome was “disgusted” by the idea.
Walsh added: “The hardest thing about our conversation on Friday evening was telling him that I no longer trusted him in the way that I once did.”
Meanwhile the former head of cycling’s governing body, the UCI, has finally admitted he knew about Froome’s adverse test result before leaving his post.
Brian Cookson lost the UCI’s presidential election on 21 September and was replaced by David Lappartient, the day after Team Sky were informed of the issue.
When approached by The Independent this week, Cookson’s representatives sent a statement insisting that as UCI president he had “no role or influence in any case” and could not comment further.
However, on Saturday he admitted: “I was informed that Chris Froome had provided an A sample with an anomalous result for a substance that did not result in an immediate provisional suspension in the last 24 hours of my tenure at UCI.
“When I left the UCI the following day, the matter passed to the new President and, rightly, I was no longer informed about the matter. I cannot comment further on this or any other ongoing case.”
The admission raises questions as to why, a few days before Froome's adverse test was made public last week, Cookson chose to defend Team Sky and called for their reputation to be "reinstated", knowing full well that the integrity of Froome's Vuelta victory was compromised.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments