Chris Froome criticises UCI chief David Lappartient as dispute escalates over Team Sky rider’s decision to race
In a televised interview on Wednesday, the UCI president said it would be a ‘disaster’ for the sport if Froome was to compete at the Tour de France in July
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Chris Froome has criticised the head of world cycling, David Lappartient, for speaking out in the media about the Briton’s decision to continue competing while a decision over his Salbutamol case is still pending.
Froome’s legal team are currently building a defence after he returned an adverse analytical finding during his 2017 Veulta a Espana triumph for the asthma drug. As Salbutamol is listed by Wada as a specified substance, Froome was not provisionally suspended and has chosen to continue racing – he is currently at the Tirreno-Adriatico, a World Tour race in Italy.
In a televised interview on Wednesday, the UCI president said it would be a “disaster” for the sport were the Team Sky rider to compete at the Tour de France in July while his case remained unresolved.
On Thursday Froome told Cycling News: “I saw [Lappartient’s] comments yesterday and I think what I would say is that I’m doing my best to follow the due process here, in this matter. I get that it’s a difficult situation, this was obviously meant to have been a confidential UCI process but this was made public, so that changes things.
“Given his concern for the reputation of the sport, I think it would be more sensible of him to raise his concerns in person or at least though the right channels as opposed to through the media. I’m obviously doing everything I can to get this resolved as quickly as possible, and just trying to keep my head down.”
Asked whether he believes a potential victory in the Tour de France would stand, even if he subsequently received a ban over the Salbutamol affair, Froome responded: “I think that’s what the rules read, yes. I think that’s what the Wada rules state.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments