The bald truth: cricketers can't resist 'Russian hair revolution'

Robin Scott Elliot
Wednesday 02 December 2009 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Russia may not know much of the Great Game but when it comes to hair there is, apparently, nowhere better than the steppes for producing the rethatching material for cricket's great and good who, after a lifetime of caps and sunhats, have discovered they are going a bit thin on top.

Michael Vaughan is joining a stellar cast: Shane Warne, Graham Gooch, Martin Crowe and Greg Matthews are among a lengthy list of cricketers and sportsmen – in Ireland it's Shamrock Rovers "ace" Noel Mooney – who have had their fading locks restored to former glories. And they owe their resurrected plumages to Russians, the producers of the "finest quality hair," according to Carl Howell, founder and chairman of Advanced Hair Studio.

The process goes like this: a Russian grows his or her hair, it's then "farmed" and over a period of months and several treatments grafted on to the lucky recipient. "It's like losing a tooth," says Howell, "if you lose one you get it replaced."

For some reason, it has proved popular among cricketers, and, it is said, particularly so among the current Australian side. Several of them – perhaps having torn out clumps while losing the Ashes – are believed to have undergone the treatment, but chosen not to go public. Any thoughts, Ricky?

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in