Kent defend Clark signing ahead of Ashes

Kylie Maclellan,Reuters
Wednesday 18 March 2009 17:30 GMT
Comments
(GETTY IMAGES)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Kent have defended the decision to sign Australian bowler Stuart Clark for the run-up to the Ashes series after criticism from English cricket's chief that the move may help their age-old rivals.

Kent announced they had signed the 33-year-old seamer until June as he recovers from the elbow injury which has kept him out of Australia's tour of South Africa.

England and Wales Cricket Board (ECB) managing director Hugh Morris said the county's move had provoked 'dismay' as England prepare their bid to wrest back the Ashes won by Australia in a 5-0 whitewash in the 2006/7 series, in which Clark took 26 wickets.

"It is difficult recruiting good quality overseas players with all the commitments around the world at the moment and good cricketers who will really do a good job for you are few and far between now," Kent chief executive Paul Millman told Reuters today.

"So when the opportunity of Stuart came up we took it quickly, if we hadn't another county would have done there is absolutely no doubt about that."

Kent's decision followed Middlesex's signing of opener Phil Hughes, who has shone in the series win over South Africa. Morris and England selector Geoff Miller condemned the signings.

"The decision of Kent to sign Stuart Clark so that he can continue his rehabilitation after injury to enable him to be fit for the Ashes series has been met with dismay throughout the game," Morris was widely quoted as saying in the British media.

"Of course, it is up to Kent which players they sign but it is an incredibly busy and important year for cricket in England and we wish to give the team every chance of regaining the Ashes."

Miller said: "Middlesex have already signed a batsman in Phil Hughes who has not had experience of English conditions before and now will have that for the Ashes - I don't think that would happen the other way round."

But Millman said Kent were doing their part to support the success of English cricket.

"We've got four cricketers in line for English selection this summer," he said. "Four cricketers who we've nurtured and brought through for English cricket... so we are not stinting in our support for English cricket."

Millman said the club, which was relegated to division two of the county championship last season, had to balance its support for England with the success of Kent cricket.

"It is possible this summer that we might not see a lot of Amjad Khan (playing for Kent) and that's great for English cricket and great for Amjad but it leaves a bit of a gap for us and we've got to think about how we fill that gap," said Millman.

England play Australia in the first of five Ashes tests in Cardiff on 8 July.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in