Garner labels review system as a 'gimmick'

Pa
Thursday 10 December 2009 11:31 GMT
Comments
(GETTY IMAGES)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

West Indies legend Joel Garner has labelled the controversial umpire decision review system currently being introduced into Test cricket "a gimmick" and claimed it is "not working".

The review system allows each team a maximum of two unsuccessful challenges per innings against umpires' decisions but West Indies Cricket Board director Garner, known as "Big Bird" during his days as a fearsome fast bowler, believes the use of technology in the game has gone too far.

"I can understand the use of TV technology in terms of run outs, stumpings and that sort of thing, like whether the ball has pitched between wicket and wicket or outside leg-stump, if the umpire has doubts," he told the Trinidad & Tobago Express.

"But not for every little thing you can think about to question the judgment of the umpire.

"You still want the umpires to use their own judgment. If you're going to use it, it should only be used specifically for one or two things but not to question every little thing that happens with the umpires."

English official Mark Benson's withdrawal one day into the second Test between Australia and the West Indies was widely put down to controversies relating to the review system, though he quickly attributed it to ill health.

Benson's decision to give Windies batsman Shivnarine Chanderpaul not out in the first innings was overturned by third umpire Asad Rauf despite television evidence failing to conclusively contradict the original verdict.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in