Former England captain Michael Vaughan denies 'agenda' claims by Jonathan Trott
Trott raised questions over Vaughan's impartiality in his role as a pundit
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Michael Vaughan has denied that his role in a sports management company influenced comments he made about Jonathan Trott, and added: "I will not accept any attack on my honesty or my integrity."
Trott, in his autobiography 'Unguarded', which is being serialised by the Times, raised questions over the former England captain's impartiality in his role as a pundit, given his relationship with International Sports Management.
Trott, who had to leave England's 2013-14 Ashes campaign after the first Test because of a stress-related illness, said: "But then Michael Vaughan, writing in the Telegraph, said that he felt 'conned' when he heard my account... He effectively suggested that I was looking for an excuse to dodge Mitchell Johnson.
"It was the Vaughan criticism that was the most damaging. I began to question if he had an agenda as well.
"His (Vaughan's) own website - and his profile on the ISM website - stated: 'He also fulfils an important role guiding the young players on ISM's books as the business development manager.'
"ISM had an interest in several players on the verge of the England sides. So if I was out of the way - and Vaughan's scorn for my condition made it quite clear that he thought I should be banished for ever - might there be more room in the side for the likes of Joe Root, Jonny Bairstow (who was with them at the time but isn't now), Scott Borthwick and Ben Stokes?"
But in a statement issued on behalf of ISM, a spokesman for Vaughan said that Trott's claims were wrong.
He said: "In fact, at the time of writing that article, Michael held no role with ISM other than being a client of ISM.
"Michael has never managed or played any role in the management of any of the cricketers named in (Thursday's) article. The cricketers named - Joe Root, Jonny Bairstow and Ben Stokes - are ranked and widely regarded as amongst the very best in the world in their respective disciplines (batsman, wicket keeper/batsman and all-rounder). Their respective records and performances speak for themselves.
"It is wholly wrong and entirely false to suggest that any comments made by Michael concerning professional cricketers are anything other than his genuinely held, honest opinions."
Vaughan responded to Trott's comments by saying in a statement posted on his official Twitter account: "Criticism of my opinions, my actions and even personal criticisms are all fair game, but I will not accept any attack on my honesty or my integrity.
"Nor will I accept accusations that I set out to positively damage the career of any professional cricketer."
PA
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments