David Warner demands India ball-tampering probe: ‘Squashed it as fast as they could’

The controversy occurred during India A’s tour match against Australia A when the ball was changed because it had a ‘scratch’

Luke Baker
Wednesday 06 November 2024 11:08 GMT
Comments
Umpire Shawn Craig spoke to India A’s players to inform them of the ball change
Umpire Shawn Craig spoke to India A’s players to inform them of the ball change (Getty Images)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

David Warner has called for a ball-tampering probe to be opened against India after controversy during their A-team match against Australia.

During the fourth innings of the match between India A and Australia A in Mackay on Sunday, umpire Shawn Craig accused India of having caused a “scratch” on the ball.

The ball was changed before the fourth morning as a result and both teams notified, with Craig telling India’s players on the field: “When you scratch it, we change the ball. There will be no more discussion, let’s play. This is not a discussion, you will be playing with that ball.”

Wicketkeeper Ishan Kishan appeared to dispute the call to change the ball, labelling it “a stupid decision”, before Craig responded saying Kishan would be on report for dissent.

Cricket Australia (CA) issued a statement after the game which said the ball was changed due to “deterioration” and that no further action would be taken, effectively clearing India’s players and allowing them to escape any sanction.

But Warner – who was banned from cricket for 12 months for his role in the ‘Sandpaper-gate’ ball-tampering scandal that engulfed Australian cricket a few years ago – believes CA “squashed [the siutation] as fast as they could” due to India playing a five-Test series in Australia later this month.

And the opener wants to see a full investigation reopened into the incident.

“I think the ultimate decision’s with CA, isn’t it?” Warner said when speaking to reporters after being appointed as captain of Big Bash League team Sydney Thunder on Wednesday. “I think they’ve obviously squashed it as fast as they could, given that India’s coming out here this summer.

“But if the umpires deem that something happened, then I’m sure there’ll be a follow-up and I think the umpires or the match referee should be standing here answering those questions.

“The match referee should be coming out and addressing his own staff, who are the umpires, and if they’re sticking by the umpire’s decisions, then you’ve got to stand up for that. I think that’s obviously a statement that CA probably need to release.”

David Warner was speaking after being named captain of the Sydney Thunder
David Warner was speaking after being named captain of the Sydney Thunder (Getty Images)

Cricket Australia declined to comment when Reuters reached out to them.

Warner retired from international cricket earlier his year but has indicated he would be open to returning to the Test arena if Australia want him to help plug the hole they have at the top of the order.

The ex-Australia vice-captain was banned for life from holding any leadership postions within the game after his role in ‘Sandpaper-gate’ but CA rescinded the ban last month after a review panel determined the 38-year-old was genuine in acknowledging responsibility and had “extreme remorse”.

Additional reporting by Reuters

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in