Ashes 2015: England set sights on speedy end to series ahead of fourth Test
In seven matches this year Alastair Cook's team have won one then lost the next – an unprecedented sequence which they must now consign to history at Trent Bridge
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.England may have surprised themselves. By the start of next week the Ashes could be regained. As a prospect three months ago this would have been risible, so perplexingly fickle were England, so confidently swaggering were Australia.
Somehow, England have made a virtue out of their mercurial ways. Last summer they had to come back from an abysmal defeat against India to win the series. This year, in seven matches spanning three series, they have won one only to lose the next.
It is an unprecedented sequence and it may have helped fuel the belief that any defeat can be turned round. The loss by 405 runs in the Second Test at Lord’s, which levelled the series at 1-1, seemed to have a worryingly terminal air. The real Australia and the real England had arrived.
Not a bit of it. England lost the toss in Edgbaston and almost nothing else in the eight sessions of the match that followed. So contrasting have been the fortunes across the three Tests that it would be folly now to predict how it might turn out.
Following England’s unexpected win in Cardiff their new coach, Trevor Bayliss, refused to embrace the general exultation and warned that Australia would be back. He was proved correct by events at Lord’s a few days later but came to regret giving quite such a fillip to his compatriots.
After the triumph in Birmingham, which puts England 2-1 ahead, Bayliss said: “I was right and they probably will again. You don’t have the success over a period of time that they’ve had without being able to put those things behind you, as we did ourselves in this game.
“You look at the positives from our point of view and, using them as an example, we have also been able to come back and hopefully in years to come we can have the success that the Australian team have had.”
A dip into history suggests that England’s followers have mild cause for optimism. Only once have Australia come from behind after three matches to win the series. The last time England won the third Test of the rubber, in 1981, they went on to claim the Ashes.
If England were to lose at Trent Bridge in the Fourth Investec Test which starts on Thursday, they would still rather think they were due to win the next, what would then be the clincher at The Oval.
“We will take 3-2,” said Bayliss. “Obviously we want to win the next one and take the fifth game out of it. We’ll certainly be playing to win the next match. I think we can take some lessons out of this match – some of the Australians will be under pressure, as we were in this game, and hopefully we will be able to build on that pressure in the next match and not let them up off the floor.
“The message to the boys is go away and relax for a few extra days but come back with their own personal plans in place. I think that was the big change for us in this game – I think guys had their own plans in their own minds and went out and did it. I felt in London that we just got away from our individual plans on how to bat and bowl against this opposition.”
The loss of Jimmy Anderson, definitely for Trent Bridge, almost certainly for The Oval, is grievous for England whatever the merits of his potential replacements, Mark Wood (most likely), Liam Plunkett (possible) and Mark Footitt (improbable). He had just made his first significant intervention of the campaign in conditions to which his craft was ideally suited when he felt a twinge in his side.
This is a big hole to fill but it is not as gaping as it might have been a week ago. Charging into the summer, a bowler reborn, came Steve Finn. Transformed entirely from the player he had become 18 months ago, Finn was fast, achieved bounce and movement and surpassed anything he had managed in a Test match before.
There will be many theories about Finn’s decline which saw him reach a level that made it possible to fear for his continued existence as a professional player. Chief among them may be the possibility that too many people were offering him advice and, anxious to please them, he ended up knowing not what to do.
Finn’s return now in such a decisive fashion could not have been more timely given Anderson’s exodus. It gives England options they feared they would not have and may free up Wood to open the bowling with Stuart Broad.
Presumably, England would settle for the type of pitch in Nottingham that they found in Birmingham, a surface where there was enough carry and the ball seamed. It scrutinises batsmanship in a way that happens almost nowhere else.
The decision to promote Ian Bell to No 3 in the order paid early dividends with two half-centuries, though Adam Lyth’s place as Alastair Cook’s opening partner looks increasingly vulnerable.
Bell came out on his home ground clearly having decided that he would play most of his strokes – which by the way is a considerable array – as soon as he came the crease and to hell with it. There were some worrying moments but Bell backed his class and was rewarded.
At Trent Bridge, England could do with at least one of their middle order firing. No blame whatever can be attached to Jonny Bairstow or Ben Stokes for being dismissed by brutal bumpers from Mitchell Johnson at Edgbaston, Jos Buttler is coming to terms with how he should play Test cricket, Moeen Ali is a superb No 8 whose spin bowling continues to be a concern.
Bayliss made it clear in his understated way what he expects from his batsmen from now on, what they have lacked now for two matches.
“One thing we didn’t have, from either side, was someone to score a hundred and bat for a long, long time,” he said. “Yes, it might have been a bit difficult, but there were enough guys that actually got starts that showed it wasn’t impossible to bat on. Sometimes in those difficult situations it just needs that little bit of extra application to get through those tough periods, and then the easy runs come later on.”
He was right. England can win this series by application. Lyth scoring his second Test hundred would save the selectors some long dark nights of the soul.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments