Ashes 2013-14: Even Nathan Lyon has got tourists in a spin
Spinner picked up possibly the easiest five-wicket-haul that he will get in his career thanks to England's incompetence a the crease
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.As successful as they have been in recent years, this England team have always struggled to find an effective way to play high-class slow bowling. The evidence of this disappointing Ashes series suggests they now have a problem against middle-of-the-road off-spin.
Nathan Lyon is a perfectly competent cricketer, who reached 100 Test wickets in England’s second innings here, but he is what Australians call a “tradesman”. He is highly unlikely to produce a magical spell, in the manner of Muttiah Muralitharan, Saeed Ajmal or even, on his best days, Graeme Swann. Yet at times in this series, England have tackled Lyon as though he is all three of those players rolled into one.
When they have attacked, it has usually been the lofted drive down the ground, for four or six. Thereafter, defence. Rarely have England managed to rotate the strike against Lyon (right), making it far easier for him to settle on a regular line and length.
It is, of course, harder to be assertive against a spin bowler when you are behind in the game, as England have been throughout this winter, but for their supporters it must be maddening to see experienced international batsmen retreat into their shells against the workmanlike Lyon.
“It’s nice when the opposition helps you out a lot, and boy, have England helped Australia out a lot in this series, and especially in their second innings here,” remarked former Australia captain Ian Chappell from the television commentary box. He was responding to Ben Stokes’ dismissal, a miscued shot down the ground that flew straight to long-off and gave Lyon his second wicket.
Stokes is playing only his third Test and has plenty of promise, so we should not be too critical. Next time, though, he might decide to push the ball down the ground, take the single and rotate the strike.
Against a spinner, it is always a risk if you try to go from first gear to fifth and straight back again. Block, block, block, try to hit a boundary, block block. There must be – and apologies for using a New Labour slogan – a third way. Not only does rotation of the strike make Lyon’s task a little trickier, it ensures the Australia captain, Michael Clarke, has to think more carefully about his field placings and bowling options.
Lyon’s job is also made easier by a pace attack which has given England nothing. But before he even bowled in the second innings, Lyon had already done England significant damage with the bat, making an unbeaten 18 in a last-wicket partnership of 40 with Brad Haddin, which reduced England’s first-innings lead to 51.
England were complicit in the stand, adopting completely different tactics against the final pair than those that had served them so well against Australia’s other batsmen on the second day. Even when a spinner is batting, England’s thinking still becomes muddled.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments