What is timed out in cricket? Rules explained after Angelo Mathews controversy
Angelo Mathews became the first player in international cricket history to be timed out
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Angelo Mathews became the first player in 146 years of international cricket to be timed out, sparking tensions in a Cricket World Cup match between Sri Lanka and Bangladesh.
The laws of cricket state that the batter has to be ready to face the next ball within three minutes of dismissal or retirement, in the World Cup, it is two minutes.
It is the most uncommon form of dismissal and one that has not been seen before in the history of international cricket, but it is also not a common feature of the club or county cricket scene. It could spark a debate, just as Alex Carey’s dismissal of Jonny Bairstow did in the Ashes, over the spirit of cricket.
The Sri Lanka batter came out to the crease and was not ready to face his first ball within two minutes, and bowler Shakib Al Hasan and Bangladesh appealed.
Mathews attempted to argue he had an issue with his helmet, but the umpires had to uphold the decision when Bangladesh chose not to withdraw the appeal.
Sri Lanka had been going well in their first innings against Bangladesh, and were 135 for three when Sadeera Samarawickrama advanced down the wicket and played the ball straight to Mahmudullah just inside the boundary rope.
That was the wicket that sparked the chain of events that will go down in history.
Mathews hovered on the sidelines before eventually departing the pitch in a controversial chain of events. He had been preparing to face the delivery when the strap of his helmet broke, and while waiting for the replacement, passed the two-minute mark.
Facing against the spin-bowler, Mathews did not have to wear a helmet, but it could spark yet another debate surrounding the spirit of cricket.
The laws of cricket state that the batter has to be ready to face the next ball within three minutes of dismissal or retirement, in the World Cup, it is two minutes.
Ex-Ireland wicketkeeper Niall O’Brien said on Test Match Special: “I think he was ready to face the ball. He was on the pitch and his equipment failed him. I think there was a mistake there.”
Sri Lanka are seventh in the table, four points behind New Zealand who occupy the final semi-final place, but there is still more to play for with only the top eight qualifying for the 2025 Champions Trophy.
Bangladesh are also in the hunt for qualification, but are ninth in the table, and ahead of the match were the only other team - as well as England - to have won just one of their seven matches.
The match had already faced problems due to the poor air quality in Delhi that forced Bangladesh to cancel training, and then only allow the non-asthmatic players to take part ahead of the match.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments