Andrew Strauss suggests England players questioned Saeed Ajmal's bowling action
Pakistan spinner is under investigation
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Andrew Strauss today suggested that members of the current England team had questioned the legitimacy of Saeed Ajmal’s bowling action.
The Pakistan mystery spinner, considered the world’s best slow bowler, destroyed England two years ago and he looms on the horizon again, on another tour of the United Arab Emirates next year and possibly in the World Cup in February and March.
Yet Ajmal was reported last week for a suspect action and must now undergo testing to see whether he can continue to bowl in international cricket. Four members of the current England side – Alastair Cook, Ian Bell, Stuart Broad and Jimmy Anderson – faced Ajmal and Pakistan in 2012
Asked whether there had been debates at the time about Ajmal’s action, former skipper Strauss said: “Those are the conversations that go on in the dressing room, and people who faced Muttiah Muralitharan (the great Sri Lankan spinner) were doing the same thing.
“Mystery spinners are brilliant for the game but if you were [an orthodox off-spinner] like Graeme Swann, you might say: ‘Hold on. They (the mystery spinners) are getting an advantage.
Speaking on Sky Sports, Strauss said: “The authorities can’t go carte blanche, because then you will get bowlers throwing the ball. There has to be a cut-off point somewhere. It’s a thorny issue. When it becomes obvious someone is throwing it, there has to be a cut-off point.”
Ajmal has been tested once before, in 2009, but was subsequently cleared. The decision to report his action during a recent Test match against Sri Lanka appeared to suggest that a tougher policy had been adopted by the International Cricket Council.
Sri Lankan Sachithra Senanayake, New Zealand’s Kane Williamson and West Indians Marlon Samuels and Shane Shillingford – all off-spinners like Ajmal – have also been reported.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments