Adam Gilchrist on the Ashes: The urn may have gone again but we inflicted a few wounds on England

The Aussie Angle: Views of the former Australian cricketer and ESPNcricinfo Ashes columnist

Adam Gilchrist
Tuesday 06 August 2013 23:54 BST
Comments
I’d have Shane Watson opening again in the fourth Test
I’d have Shane Watson opening again in the fourth Test (Getty Images)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The mood in the Australian camp should be positive after the Old Trafford Test, even though the chance to regain the Ashes has gone. At the end of the Lord's Test I don't think anyone was really contemplating a turnaround that would return the urn to Australia. But looking at the bigger picture, they have taken some important positive steps in the overall development of this team, not just for this tour but the return series in Australia and the coming years as well.

But they have left themselves with a conundrum by shifting David Warner up the order in place of Shane Watson in the second innings in Manchester. Warner would have loved and relished that opportunity, given the match situation, and he looked much more comfortable walking in against the new ball than taking on the off-spin of Graeme Swann.

That said, if I was picking the batting order I would have Watson opening again for the fourth Test in Chester-le-Street and Warner coming in at No 6. I think that's the order that could prove most beneficial in the long term. Warner will play the majority of his Test cricket in Australia and, given the pace and bounce in the pitches at home, coming in at No 6 won't be an issue for Warner as it might be in some countries like India and England.

Before the series, I was of the opinion that Watson had to return to the top of the order and I still believe that is where he is best suited to batting. That's where Watson himself wants to play and he knows he will be judged on his results there. He hasn't yet been able to nail a big score in this series but his role in the successful first innings can't be forgotten. He didn't reach a personal milestone but if you have an opening partnership of 70 or 80 on the first day of a Test, both openers have done their job.

Watson has batted in every position from one to five in the past year of Test cricket but he clearly prefers to open. I don't think Warner would be too concerned about his position in the order, such is his mindset. Every player is different in that way. Andrew Symonds was never worried about changing positions but Damien Martyn was a guy who loved structure and, even in the short version, liked to know his role and prepare for it without being shuffled around.

I can understand why they changed the order in the second innings at Old Trafford. They were probably spoilt for choice, which is quite ironic given the concerns around the batting order in recent times.

Watson is a short-version opener and we know Warner's record in trying to be aggressive at the top, and Chris Rogers was the player who hit the ball best in the first innings. I'm not sure which way they will go with the batting order in Chester-le-Street but I hope Watson opens.

One player whose role at Old Trafford might slip under the radar, but shouldn't, is Brad Haddin. It was a fantastic turnaround for Haddin. His contribution in that match was outstanding and everything you would hope for from an experienced vice-captain who is also a high-quality batsman and your wicketkeeper. He ticked every box after coming under a lot of criticism.

I especially commend him for being able to turn things around at Old Trafford because the conditions and the crowd element make it a tough venue for overseas players. I remember having a terrible game there with the gloves during an Under-19 tour in 1991 and it was no better when I played there in the 2005 Ashes – I had an absolute horror of a Test match. My concerns for Hadds, given the venue, were high but he absolutely nailed it with both bat and gloves.

It goes without saying that the Australians will know they have climbed their way back into this series, albeit the chance to regain the Ashes is now gone. It was a great effort from England to retain the Ashes, for the third consecutive time now. They got things right at the important times in the first two Tests at Trent Bridge and Lord's, and that has been the difference.

But now the Australians are happy about the quick turnaround for another series, because they will feel they have inflicted a few wounds on England. They have a terrific opportunity now to back that up with two more positive Tests and then go back home to Australia and really challenge England in more familiar conditions.

One thing is certain: things look much brighter now than they did two weeks ago.

To read Adam Gilchrist’s columns in full throughout the Ashes series, visit the leading cricket website espncricinfo.com

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in