Cricket: Salisbury struggling

James Allen
Saturday 07 August 1993 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sussex 424

Worcestershire 253 and 293-8

SUSSEX still have work to do but they are strongly placed to force a victory that would put them in good heart for the NatWest Trophy semi-final against Glamorgan on Tuesday, a match which will decide the direction of their season. Lose it and the dreaded quest for respectability in the Championship becomes all important.

Worcestershire, already well down that road, had the best of the first hour in limiting their first- innings deficit to 171 but were then undone by the tidy medium pace of John North and the seasoned off-spin of Eddie Hemmings. To the notable wickets of Tim Curtis and Graeme Hick, North added that of Martin Weston, who proved the most oburate of the top three.

Hick looked ill at ease except when facing Ian Salisbury, off whom he took all 21 of his runs before giving a catch at the wicket, pushing defensively down the wrong line. A big score had seemed there for the taking against an inexperienced attack lacking Franklyn Stephenson, who is being rested in advance of Tuesday.

Salisbury had a wretched time before lunch, bowling a three-over mixture of long hops and full tosses that cost 28 runs. Lesser players than Hick would have taken advantage and Alan Wells, the Sussex captain, had no choice but to take him off. The youthful new-ball pair Ed Giddins and Danny Law, had conceded nearly five an over and the lead was rapidly evaporating.

To his creidt, Salisbury bowled better in his subsequent spells, though there were few overs without at least one loose delivery. Thanks to the agility of Peter Moores he ended the stand between Steve Rhodes and Phil Newport that delayed Sussex longest. No matter that the delivery was a long hop that Rhodes edged on to his pad in attempting to pull; wickets will restore Salisbury's confidence and it is not just Sussex who need him to rediscover his best.

In a lengthy spell either side of tea, Hemmings showed the way. Offering the occasional glimpse of variation and maintaining an impeccable line, he was rewarded with three wickets, two of them to catches close to the bat, with Worcestershire still in arrears.

Worcestershire needed a mere seven overs at the start to take the last four Sussex wickets. Wells added only five runs to his 128 overnight before falling to Newport, who had an outstanding day all round. Fifteen minutes before the close he pulled Giddins high over sqaure leg for four to reach a half-century that has given Worcestershire hope. With two wickets remaining, they lead by 122.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in