Council criticised by inquiry
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.SPORTS POLITICS The Sports Council was strongly criticised yesterday by the all- party Committee of Public Accounts for mishandling publicly funded assets and services.
The main source of income for the Council is the Department of National Heritage. Since 1989, the Council has made a number of changes designed to strengthen their commercial activities.
The inquiry set out to discover the relationship between the Sports Council, the commercial and charitable companies associated with it, the council's former director general, and the Department of National Heritage.
The Committee strongly criticised the time taken for the Council to instigate proper arrangements to account clearly for public funds. They also said they were "disquieted to learn the real conflicts of interest that arose which disadvantaged the Councilfinancially in contractual arrangements with Sportspartner Ltd", a charitable company created to enable the Council to manage funds more efficiently.
They were particularly concerned to learn that the former director general and the former finance director had conflicts of interest. The director general had resigned as a director of Sportspartner when the conflicts of interest were brought to his attention, but he remained as a director of a subsidiary.
The Committee also attacked the complex structure of charitable and trading companies "beyond the control" of the Department of National Heritage.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments