Lucas Browne fails second drugs test - seven months after his first
Browne was due to face Shannon Briggs for the WBA 'regular' heavyweight title
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Lucas Browne's promoters are investigating the Australian heavyweight boxer's second positive doping result in a year, saying it is "a bitter blow" after his previous exemption.
Hatton Promotions issued a statement early Wednesday saying it was aware of reports Browne had failed a test undertaken recently as part of the World Boxing Council's clean boxing program.
This comes seven months after he tested positive for the banned substance Clenbuterol following the March 5 bout against Ruslan Chagaev of Uzbekistan, which he won in a 10th-round technical knockout.
Browne was suspended by the World Boxing Association following that test but was later cleared after alleging his food was deliberately contaminated, and was scheduled to fight Shannon Briggs for the WBA's "regular" title by the end of the year.
"Clearly the test results are hugely disappointing for the company and for Lucas himself," the statement said.
"For a man and a team who fought so hard to clear his name following what is now universally accepted to have been a deliberate contamination of products he ingested prior to his March fight with Ruslan Chagaev, this is a bitter blow.
"Lucas was cleared of any deliberate wrongdoing a few months ago and we feel it would be somewhat unfair and incorrect for anyone to suggest that the results of his latest test bring the outcome of his previous exoneration into question."
Hatton Promotions said it wouldn't comment further until it had conducted a full investigation, including prescribed medication and supplements, of the latest case.
"Even though he has no WBC ranking to protect and is in a position for a mandatory WBA world title fight, Lucas entered the WBC Clean Boxing Program voluntarily," the statement said. "We do not feel that is the action of a man who wishes to intentionally take performance enhancing drugs."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments