FA responds after journalist barred from Saudi boxing fight night at Wembley
English football’s governing body, who own Wembley, will act ‘to ensure that press independence is upheld’
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Football Association has said it will take action to prevent any more breaches of “press freedom” after a Daily Telegraph journalist was barred from covering last weekend’s heavyweight title fight between Anthony Joshua and Daniel Dubois at Wembley,
Oliver Brown was denied entry to the fight between Joshua and Dubois after calling the bout, which was bankrolled by Saudi Arabia despite taking place in London, “an unashamed sportswashing exercise” in an article on 20 September. Dubois later won the fight with a devastating performance, knocking Joshua out in the fifth round.
But the FA, which owns Wembley, reportedly had “no involvement in the running” of the Saudi-backed event, and had “no knowledge Brown had been denied entry”, the fa-intervene-telegraph-reporter-barred/">Telegraph is reporting.
They have also said sources confirmed that any party using Wembley in the future “will now be forced to share with the FA any issues related to media accreditation in order for a resolution to be found”.
Despite taking place in London, the fight was billed as ‘Riyadh Season: Wembley Edition’, with the Saudi national anthem played before the bout and Saudi royal Turki Alalshikh sitting ringside throughout.
Former FA chairman David Bernstein said that Brown’s ban was “a flagrant breach of press freedom and free speech”.
“The FA and Wembley Stadium need to examine future agreements with users of the stadium to ensure that press independence is upheld,” he added.
Bernstein went on to say that the entire situation will only worsen and aired his concerns around the growth of Saudi influence in British sport, pointing out the need for an Independent Football Regulator.
“The huge influence of nation states in British sport, particularly football, is one of the reasons why a truly independent regulator for English football is needed,” he said.
Dame Caroline Dinenage MP, the chair of parliament’s Culture, Media & Sport select committee, said that the situation was “a slippery slope if venues are denying entry to journalists on the basis of what they have written”.
“I’m surprised at Wembley. I expected it to have more robust policies,” she added.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments