Sign up to our free sport newsletter for all the latest news on everything from cycling to boxing
Sign up to our free sport email for all the latest news
Anthony Joshua takes on Joseph Parker this weekend – and you can be sure that a number of people will decide to illegally stream the fight rather than splashing out £20 on the pay-per-view.
But before you too decide to try your luck with dodgy streams and several annoying pop-ups – just remember the case of Craig Foster, from Scarborough.
Foster was last year made to pay £5,000 to Sky after his account was used to stream a boxing match online.
Joshua’s April 2017 fight against Wladimir Klitschko cost UK customers £19.95 on Sky Sports Box Office, but it was made available to watch for free through a Facebook Live stream.
The stream was traced back to the Sky account of Foster, who says his subscription was cut shortly after.
The Facebook stream was viewed by around 4,250 people.
He also received several letters from Foot Anstey LLP, a law firm representing Sky, one of which said he faced being hit with an £85,000 penalty if the case went to court.
Foster, who agreed to pay Sky £5,000 in legal costs, claimed that one of his friends live streamed the fight through an iPad, on which Foster had already logged into his Facebook account.
He says Foot Anstey also asked for the names and addresses of all of the people who watched the fight with Foster, but he chose not to supply the details.
“Mr Foster broke the law and illegally shared copyright protected content with thousands of people online,” Neil Parkes, Partner at Foot Anstey LLP, told The Independent, speaking on behalf of Sky.
“He has since acknowledged his wrongdoing, apologised for his actions and signed a legally binding agreement in which he agrees to pay a sum of £5,000 to Sky.”
In 2016, another Sky customer was ordered to pay £16,000 in legal costs after illegally streaming Sky Sports.
In a similar case in the US, a Facebook user made Deadpool available to watch for free, while it was still being shown in cinemas.
The pirate copy was viewed by more than five million people, and the man who uploaded it to the social network reportedly faces up to three years in prison if he’s convicted of copyright infringement.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies