Bates may escape FA censure
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Ken Bates, the Chelsea chairman, could escape censure for his public row with his director Matthew Harding by slipping through a loophole in the new Premier League rules.
Graham Kelly, chief executive of the Football Association, is said to be so concerned by the pair's exchanges that he may report Bates under the terms of the new Chairman's Charter. However, that is designed only to deal with inter-club disputes, and the Premier League are unlikely to take any action.
That will put the ball firmly back into the FA's court, and they must then decide whether to charge Bates with bringing the game into disrepute.
The Chairman's Charter and the code of conduct for players and managers, which were both introduced at the start of the season, have yet to be tested, but a spokesman for the Premier League said: "The Chairman's Charter is designed to deal with relationships between clubs. The spirit of the Charter is to ensure that chairmen deal with each other in a proper manner.
"However, we do believe that all those in representative positions should act in a dignified and appropriate manner. If this matter is referred to us, then it will be looked at."
Privately, the League expressed doubt that they would have any powers to act and would simply end up referring the matter back across the corridor at Lancaster Gate.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments