Almanack: The Gatwick Stakes
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.AN UNSEEMLY row has broken out at Gatwick, where plans to add a betting shop to the shopping plaza have fallen foul of the airlines using the airport. What can their objection be to this admirable scheme? Are they worried that
delay-crazed persons, gaga with enforced muzak, may go punt-happy and blow all the money they should have spent on Duty Free goods in flight? Are they miffed that Gatwick makes more money from shops than it does from flights? No. They are worried about punters delaying departures.
The airlines claim that the shop, which is to be sited close to passport control in the North Terminal, may delay flights as passengers wait for results. 'Imagine it's the Grand National,' says Robert Schumacher, a spokesman for the airlines, 'and someone has put a wager on it and there's a stewards' inquiry. They could easily misjudge the time.'
Gatwick staff are quick to calm such fears. 'It's a 14-month trial,' says the airport's Kerry Ansell smoothly, 'and it will be closely monitored. Flight information will be relayed into the betting shop.' Isn't there a possibility of confusion between the two? Might punters find themselves seeking a 'spread' on the arrival time of BA 142 from Rio, or panic when they hear 'going behind at Gate 12'? Coral insists that the screens and 'blowers' will be adequately distinguished.
Racing fans will have noted the appropriateness of the venue: Gatwick, once a racecourse, hosted the Grand National in 1917-18.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments