Peregrine Moon lander on course to burn up in Earth’s atmosphere
The spacecraft is due to re-enter at 9pm UK time.
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A private spacecraft which blasted off to the Moon last week is on its way back to Earth after a failed mission.
The Peregrine Mission One (PM1), built by US space company Astrobotic, encountered a fuel leak shortly after launching on January 8.
While Astrobotic engineers were able to stabilise the spacecraft, the leak had caused enough damage to rule out a safe landing on the lunar surface.
The company said safe re-entry to Earth “is our top priority”, with a controlled crash planned over a remote area of the South Pacific on Thursday at 9pm UK time.
As it enters the Earth’s atmosphere, Peregrine will hit air molecules at about 17,000mph and mostly burn up and disintegrate.
Any leftover debris will end up in the Pacific.
It means that rather than floating around as space junk and being a crash hazard for other spacecraft and space objects, Peregrine will be safely disposed of.
UK scientists who helped develop a key piece of technology on Peregrine said their sensor and electronics are performing well, despite the mission not going as planned.
The Open University and RAL Space helped build the exospheric mass spectrometer – an onboard instrument known as the PITMS (Peregrine ion trap mass spectrometer).
Dr Simeon Barker, of Open University, said: “The PITMS team successfully operated the instrument during the mission lifetime in space, collecting multiple sets of data.
“The team is analysing the data now and expects to provide a further update next week.”
The team said it is working around the clock to gather data from the spacecraft before it is destroyed.
The 1.2-tonne probe – about the size of a garden shed – launched from Cape Canaveral in Florida. The mission’s aim was to land on February 23.
But shortly after separating from United Launch Alliance’s Vulcan Centaur rocket, the Astrobotic team found that Peregrine was struggling to achieve a stable position pointing towards the Sun.
Astrobotic later said the cause may have been a valve on the spacecraft failing to close.
The company said it had received data from all nine payloads designed to communicate with the lander.
Astrobotic was the first of three US companies to try to send a spacecraft to the Moon as part of Nasa’s Commercial Lunar Payload Services initiative.
Two other commercial ventures – Intuitive Machines and Firefly – have planned missions to the lunar surface this year.
The Peregrine mission’s aim was to deliver five Nasa instruments to the Moon’s surface, with the aim of studying the lunar water cycle and the local environment.
Had Peregrine been able to land on the Moon, it would have become the first private company to do so.
Controlled lunar landings have only been performed by government agencies, including the US, Soviet Union, China and India.
Meanwhile, Slim – a spacecraft built by the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (Jaxa), will attempt a soft landing on the Moon on Friday January 19.
If successful, it would make Japan the fifth country to land on the Moon.