Sam Dunn: 'Are we wasting our money in a bad area?'
House Doctor
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Question: We want to add value to a home by buying in a cheaper part of Birmingham than we'd usually consider, and then bring it up to a really high quality inside. However, my partner says we'll be in danger of making it almost impossible to sell on in a few years as all the other houses in the street won't be worth anything near ours – and nobody will want to buy it. Is he right? DI, Redditch
Answer: A financial penalty might seem a perverse punishment for making the best of a property but a very particular pitfall lies in wait for the unwary: the so-called 'ceiling price'.
This is the highest any buyer will pay to live in a given house – wherever it is – and is determined by key factors which, most critically, include the type and mix of properties in surrounding streets and your neighbourhood's broad 'desirability'.
For example, are you converting a two-bed upstairs downstairs in a row of terraced houses into an overly-ambitious four-bed family home?
And is it in a highly sought-after commuter satellite town or down-trodden slice of suburbia with shoddy transport links?
It all boils down to whether your property is likely to stick out like a sore thumb when finished, says Gavin Brazg of website theadvisory.co.uk.
"Your goal should be to bring your property up to the same standard as the rest of your street – maybe a little better but no more," he says.
"For example, you'll waste time, money and effort transforming your property into a six-bedroom palace if all around you are three-bed semi-detached properties."
However, there is a balance to be found: adding something new to your home that won't price out future buyers can give it a vital edge, says James Brooks at estate agent Kinleigh Folkard & Hayward.
"There's no reason you should be limited by the road you live in; if you have more accommodation – one bedroom and a study, say – than your neighbour, your house will simply be worth more."
But make sure you pay the right price initially to reflect the house's poor condition.
As a general rule, adds Richard Morea at broker London & Country, structural improvements and creating additional living space should add value.
"However, if the plan is to add value and sell the property quickly, you need to understand who your target buyer is and spend your budget accordingly."
A recent survey by UpMyStreet.com property price website suggested that three quarters of buyers would prefer a garden to an extra bedroom.
"In an average location, don't spend a fortune on kitchens, bathrooms and fittings if you're planning on selling your property for profit," adds Brazg.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments