Diary Of An Eco-Builder
'If you look at the energy label on a fridge, take the same interest in any electronic goods'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.I'm looking out of our bathroom window for the first time and loving it: the lush foliage of our tree is complemented by a clear view of one of Clapham's more unusual buildings, an elegant Wesleyan mission hall with a Masonic triangularity of form. Unfortunately, however, the window itself is missing, as is the ceiling, the floor above and the roof above that.
I'm looking out of our bathroom window for the first time and loving it: the lush foliage of our tree is complemented by a clear view of one of Clapham's more unusual buildings, an elegant Wesleyan mission hall with a Masonic triangularity of form. Unfortunately, however, the window itself is missing, as is the ceiling, the floor above and the roof above that.
Once again we're way behind schedule thanks to some unruly steel that has twice been sent back for refabrication. The house appears to mount a vigorous immune response whenever this thoroughly un-eco component is thrust into the heart of our timber frame. I could have wept into my Fair Trade coffee, but instead I headed into the West End of London in search of a carbon-neutral television set.
First stop, John Lewis, where I was assured that all televisions had "minimal" electricity consumption. The same adjective was used by the impatient assistant in House of Fraser, who compared televisions to irons, evidently a symbol for him of domestic inconsequence. In fact, we would need a clutch of extra power stations if televisions performed as badly as power-hungry irons.
The cheerless assistant in Selfridges began in the same vein but did tell me that plasma televisions use more electricity than either traditional cathode ray tube (CRT) sets or liquid crystal display (LCD) flat screens. He then showed me three Sharp LCD televisions that actually had energy labels stuck to them, albeit so discreetly that they needed pointing out.
In Tottenham Court Road I tried a Sony specialist, where my questions were met with incredulity. Power consumption? Was I going abroad? Finally, a few doors up at PNR Audiovision, the patient and cheerful Minesh finally took my questions seriously and did a good job of answering them, even downloading and printing out information from the internet to enable cross-brand comparison. He showed me the labels on the Sharp televisions but didn't assume they were representative of all brands (in fact, Sharp is a market leader in energy efficiency).
For the record, televisions do not consume "minimal" electricity. Screens have grown and stretched, as has our time in front of them, so they take a fair slice of the domestic energy cake. The bigger your screen, the more power you draw, but power consumption also varies across technologies and brands. As plasma screens are shameless gas-guzzlers, the competition is really between LCDs and traditional CRTs.
Although LCDs have gained a reputation for energy efficiency, this is only smaller, computer-sized screens. Above 18 inches CRTs are still winning, though not consistently. For example, a 32in Sharp widescreen CRT television has a power consumption of only 85W, compared with 135W for a flat LCD screen of the same size. But this isn't really comparing like with like: a "pure flat" Sharp CRT has an even higher consumption of 160W (what a difference a little curvature makes). Given that the future is flat, it looks like LCDs may be the long-term favourites after all.
Hopefully other brands will follow Sharp's energy labelling, so that comparisons can be made on the shop floor. The leading brands are committed to this, so it's time they delivered. Remember to check the stand-by consumption, too, which ought not to be more than 1W, as even the most diligent among us still forget to turn the thing off.
If you're interested in the energy label on a fridge, take the same interest in any electronic goods you buy. If a few more people start asking questions, those high street looks of incredulity might begin to fade.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments