Cuttings: Trees at stake
Your support helps us to tell the story
This election is still a dead heat, according to most polls. In a fight with such wafer-thin margins, we need reporters on the ground talking to the people Trump and Harris are courting. Your support allows us to keep sending journalists to the story.
The Independent is trusted by 27 million Americans from across the entire political spectrum every month. Unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock you out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. But quality journalism must still be paid for.
Help us keep bring these critical stories to light. Your support makes all the difference.
MODERN thinking on the staking of trees suggests the stake should not be so tall as to stop entirely the movement of the tree. The theory - and it works - is that the movement of the crown is transmitted to the roots and encourages them to develop more quickly, in order to provide adequate support. A stake about knee-high works perfectly on slender, feathered trees up to 6ft or 7ft tall. They learn to fend for themselves very quickly.
But if a nursery has grown a mop-headed half-standard tree - a scarlet thorn, perhaps, or a crab apple - it is going to catch a lot of wind at the top. Too low a stake will allow it to lash around cruelly. Heavy-headed young trees are better given the old-fashioned taller stake, coming almost to the top of the cleared stem.
Recently I saw a tall group of young alders nicely established on 6ft stakes. They would have made good, but for an expert who decided the stakes were too tall. Fashionable, knee-high stakes were immediately introduced and in the next decent wind every tree blew down.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments