Whitewater indictments for Clintons' partners
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The indictments of James and Susan McDougal, Bill and Hillary Clinton's partners in the original Whitewater real-estate venture, could be the clearest sign yet that the 18-month independent investigation of the presidential couple's business dealings in Arkansas is nearing a conclusion.
The 21-count indictment, which includes 11 new charges against Governor Jim Guy Tucker, Mr Clinton's successor in the statehouse in Little Rock, concern dealings during the 1980s by the Madison Guaranty Savings and Loan bank. Owned by Mr McDougal, Madison Guaranty failed in 1989 at a cost to taxpayers of up to $60m (pounds 40m).
The McDougals, who are now divorced, and Mr Tucker, then acting as a lawyer for Madison Guaranty, are accused of lying to obtain real estate loans worth millions of dollars from Madison and using some of the money for their personal benefit. Each of the fraud counts carries a fine of up to $250,000 and a maximum five years in jail.
But a statement from Kenneth Starr, the independent counsel leading the inquiry, said that the indictments charged "no criminal wrongdoing" by the Clintons, who were passive investors in the Whitewater development and whose names are not even mentioned in the long documents. Nor are any transactions involving Whitewater itself covered by the charges.
Taken together, these developments suggest Mr Starr has decided not to pursue one of the most serious allegations against Mr Clinton, that as Governor he pressured a government small-business agency to make a $300,000 loan to Mrs McDougal in 1986, which was then used to prop up the tottering Madison Guaranty. That loan does feature in the indictments, but Mr Clinton has dismissed suggestions that he intervened as "a bunch of bull''.
Under accusation for the second time in two months, Mr Tucker flatly denied the new charges, calling them "totally false," and insisting he would not resign. Mr McDougal, now in poor health and almost penniless, also vowed to fight his battle in court. The charges were "politically motivated", he said.
However, assuming the charges do now come to trial, it is not clear whether the Clintons would be called as witnesses. Nor, even if they are not required to give testimony, is their three-year Whitewater ordeal yet over. Congress may decide to hold further hearings this autumn, and the special grand jury hearing the case in Little Rock has been granted a six-month extension until 23 March next year, meaning that further indictments could be handed down.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments