Talks relieve HK market
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.HONG KONG (Reuter) - The jittery stock market fought back from an early slide yesterday after Chinese and British envoys sat down and heard each other out despite the festering row over Hong Kong's future.
But hopes remained slim for a breakthrough on the proposals by the Governor, Chris Patten, to widen democracy in Hong Kong, as China's negotiator refused to budge on the first day of a three-day meeting of the Sino-British Joint Liaison Group.
'We will not discuss the Hong Kong-British government's proposal on political reform,' Guo Fengmin said before the talks - the chief forum for issues concerning the colony's transition to Chinese sovereignty in 1997. 'Neither will we make any counter-proposals,' he said.
The half-day talks ended on schedule with both sides describing them as frank, but reporting no progress. Nervous investors who had feared China might walk out of the talks heaved a sigh of relief. 'This is a good start,' said a member of a securities firm.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments