Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

'Tailhook' resignations

Rupert Cornwell
Thursday 24 September 1992 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

WASHINGTON - Two top Navy admirals were effectively sacked yesterday and a third 're-assigned', as the Pentagon delivered a blistering first report outlining the attempt from within its ranks to cover up the sexual harassment scandal involving naval and marine pilots at their annual 'Tailhook' convention 12 months ago, writes Rupert Cornwell.

Presenting the findings of the report, the acting Navy Secretary, Sean O'Keefe, announced that Rear-Admiral Duvall Williams, the commander of the Naval Investigation Service, and Rear- Admiral John Gordon, the service's Judge Advocate General, were being replaced by civilians.

The 'request of early retirement' by both men had been accepted, Mr O'Keefe said. The Navy's Inspector General, Admiral George Washington Davis, is meanwhile being moved to another job.

Admiral Williams was accused of 'repeatedly attempting' to block the investigation, while Admiral Gordon was castigated for his 'poor professional judgement' in not pressing sufficiently the inquiry into the worst sex scandal to hit the US armed forces in decades.

The incidents in question occurred at the Hilton Hotel, Las Vegas, in September 1991, when at least 26 women aviators were forced to run a gauntlet of their male colleagues lined up in a corridor. The women were fondled, ridiculed with sexual obscenities, and in several cases had their clothes half-torn from their bodies.

The report bluntly declares that the senior officials in charge of the investigation 'allowed their concern for the Navy as an institution to obscure the need to determine accountability for the misconduct'.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in