Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

UN imposes sanctions on North Korea

David Usborne
Sunday 15 October 2006 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The UN Security Council unanimously adopted a package of economic and trade sanctions against North Korea last night, six days after it stunned the world by announcing it had conducted its first successful nuclear test.

"We are very pleased at the outcome," the US ambassador to the UN, John Bolton, said after the Security Council ended nearly a week of sometimes tense negotiations on punishing North Korea for the test. The final resolution contained several late compromises requested by Russia and China.

In the end, the council agreed on a text condemning the test and demanding that the regime in Pynongyang desist from pursuing its nuclear weapons programme and return to six-country talks on the issue, which it has boycotted for more than a year.

The resolution allows nations to inspect cargo moving in and out of North Korea in pursuit of non-conventional weapons.

Most sensitive were the efforts by the US to pass a resolution under Chapter 7 of the UN Charter. This would have given it maximum legal weight. In the end, however, it backed down in the face of pressure from China and Russia, to include wording to clarify that the use of Chapter 7 does not imply that non-compliance by North Korea may lead to military action against it.

There is deep sensitivity over the issue, not least because in 2003 the US used a Chapter 7 resolution on Iraq to try to justify its invasion of that country.

The North Korean envoy walked out after the vote.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in