Prince Charles under fire following official visit to Bahrain, amid rising levels of torture and oppression
'It's extremely disappointing that he’s agreed to help the British government ingratiate itself further with such an abusive government,' says Human Rights Watch
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Human rights campaigners have criticised Prince Charles over a scheduled visit to Bahrain amid claims torture and oppression remain a concern in the Gulf state.
The Prince of Wales is due to make an official visit to Bahrain, Oman and the United Arab Emirates on behalf of the British Government in November to “help strengthen the United Kingdom’s warm bilateral relations", according to a statement released by Clarence House.
But the trip to the strategically important Gulf state has been attacked as "totally inappropriate" by anti-arms trade campaigners, and Human Rights Watch have described the visit as "extremely disappointing".
Nicholas McGeehan, Bahrain researcher at Human Rights Watch, told The Independent: "Prince Charles has taken a free-thinking, principled stance on many important issues, so it’s difficult to credit that he’s not aware of the serious and worsening human rights situation in Bahrain.
"It's extremely disappointing that he’s agreed to help the British government ingratiate itself further with such an abusive government."
Earlier this year the Palace was criticised by a leading human rights organisations for the decision to seat Queen Elizabeth next to the King of Bahrain during a celebration for her 90th birthday.
Human Rights Watch described the decision to place the Queen next Bahrain’s head of state as an "error of judgement".
In response, representatives of the King of Barain told The Independent: "In 2011, His Majesty King Hamad set up an independent inquiry of international experts to investigate human rights abuses in Bahrain. His Majesty accepted its findings in full and has since implemented significant human rights and socio-economic reforms in Bahrain. As part of his reform programme, His Majesty established the office of the Ombudsman at the Ministry of the Interior which is an independent body aimed at ensuring compliance with professional standards of policing and investigating complaints. "
A report by Amnesty International last year accused Bahrain of overseeing "rampant abuses including torture, arbitrary detentions and excessive use of force against peaceful activists and government critics."
Despite reports of abuse, British arms sales to Bahrain have increased significantly over the past five years, with the UK covering arms such as machine guns, assault rifles and anti-armour ammunition in deals worth £45 million, according to the Campaign Against Arms Trade (CAAT) organisation.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments