Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Iraq dismisses British compromise proposal

Ap
Thursday 13 March 2003 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Iraq's Foreign Minister Naji Sabri today dismissed a British compromise proposal on a US-backed resolution to the UN Security Council, calling it "an attempt to beautify a rejected aggressive project".

"It's trying to polish this project, which has been rejected by the majority of Security Council members," he told journalists.

Sabri also said that a high-level Arab peace mission that was scheduled to travel to Baghdad this week would not come, although he said Iraq had not rejected the visit.

"We did not refuse to receive the Arab committee," Sabri said. "They are coming not for tourism. They are coming for work, and this requires measures."

"We are trying to agree on a time appropriate for both sides," he added.

The British proposal to give Iraq a six-point list of disarmament tasks or face war appeared to be a compromise because the United States and Britain are having trouble winning support for a Monday deadline for Saddam Hussein to disarm or face war.

Proponents of the resolution have been having trouble rounding up the nine Security Council votes needed for the measure to be approved.

Asked about divisions on the Security Council, Sabri said it wasn't divided at all.

"These are not divisions. There is a majority on the Security Council rejecting the policy of war adopted by British and American evil," he said. "This majority adheres to peace."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in