'Dossier did not correspond with reality'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Government Iraq dossier "did not correspond with reality", the UN's chief weapons inspector said yesterday, casting further doubts on its use to bolster Britain's case for going to war.
The focus of the criticism was the Government's intelligence claim that Saddam Hussein's regime was capable of deploying weapons of mass destruction within 45 minutes.
It is the same claim that has featured heavily in the Hutton inquiry, which will today begin its fourth week investigating the circumstances surrounding the death of the scientist Dr David Kelly.
Dimitris Perricos, who replaced Hans Blix as the chief UN weapons inspector in Iraq two months ago, dismissed the intelligence as having no foundation in truth.
He also said that inspections found no evidence to support British and American accusations that Saddam possesssed an arsenal capable of widespread death and damage.
"There is no doubt that the phrase 'within 45 minutes' that was included in the British report did not correspond to reality," Mr Perricos said in the Greek newspaper Eleftherotypia.
"The assertion that the Iraqis had a capability to inflict overwhelming destruction within 45 minutes is collapsing.
"The uranium never existed, and the aluminum pipes that supposedly [were to be] used in the enrichment of uranium possibly were just intended to be used for bombshells."
As teams of British, American and Australian troops continued to search for evidence of chemical or biological weapons, Mr Perricos said that there had been no discovery to date of a "smoking gun" in Iraq.
"From the inspections, no evidence was found that would justify a war," he said.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments