Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

New members from the east will kill CAP

Andrew Marshall
Tuesday 17 January 1995 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The European Union must reform the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) before it lets in new members from central Europe, according to four new EU studies.The EU would have to spend as much as £25bn a year more on farm subsidies if the new countries were admitted without reform, say the reports. But the European Commission's own agriculture officials contest the figure, saying that substantial reform is not needed. "A long-overdue debate is getting into top gear," said a Commission official yesterda y.

The reports, by experts from France, Britain, Italy and Germany, vary in their analyses. But they converge on the view that the system must be changed before new countries can come in. Otherwise, the costs would be exorbitant - between 13.5 and 32.5bn ecus (£10.6bn and £25.5bn). The CAP will also run into problems staying within the rules laid down by the Uruguay Round of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (Gatt), the pact that was supposed to ensure an end to world farm trade wars.

One report, by the UK's Professor Alan Buckwell of Wye College, says that "an EU with 21 states will not be able to respect its [Gatt] commitments". Stefan Tangermann of Germany, argues that "price support is likely to threaten long-term productivity" i n the new entrants. Secondo Tarditi of Italy said: "The effects on economic efficiency, income distribution, and the environment would be socially desirable." And according to Louis Mahe of France, "extending fully the current CAP does not seem feasible o r advisable".

The Commission is divided on this: its agricultural service reckons existing reforms have gone a long way towards solving the problem. The overall cost might be as low as 4-5 bn ecus, and this could be handled within the existing EU budget.

The Commission is preparing its own analysis of the problem, one of the most divisive that Europe has to confront in the next few years. In June it will deliver a report on the agricultural situation in central Europe, and in December a more far-reachingdocument on the next steps. A call for reform would be highly divisive: the CAP is the bedrock of the EU and loss of revenue would cause a storm. "Politically, it's impossible to reform the CAP again," said one Commission official.

But others disagree. The four reports released yesterday were put together by independent experts for Sir Leon Brittan, the Trade Commissioner, who was in charge of eastern Europe under the outgoing Commission. They have clearly been released now to get a debate under way as the EU examines all the aspects of bringing in Central and Eastern Europe.

The last round of reform of the Common Agricultural Policy is already causing problems, with France, for example, concerned about the impact on its cereal exporters. Officials say that the reforms were "a little bit too successful" last year, but add th a t things are improving.

Everyone agrees that the figures being bandied around at the moment are unreliable. "All the data is very questionable," said the Commission official. The politics, however, are not in doubt. France currently holds the presidency of the European Union, and will not be in a mood to allow the issue to surface until well after its Presidential election in spring.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in