Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Modernise or die, Blair tells partners

Socialist congress: Prime Minister to call for labour flexibility

Sarah Helm Malmo
Thursday 05 June 1997 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Tony Blair will today stake out a powerful claim to lead a European revival calling on Socialist leaders across Europe to "modernise or die".

Speaking at the Congress of European Socialists, in the Swedish city of Malmo, Mr Blair will challenge his partners to abandon the "statist" policies of the old left or risk losing the trust of European citizens.

He will tell other leaders: "Our task is not to go on fighting old battles but to show that there is a third way. A way of labour market flexibility and security in a world of change."

He will warn: "We have no more divine right to govern than the parties we oppose."

The Prime Minister will also speak bluntly to fellow Europeans about his deep disillusionment with European policy-making after just one month in office. In an attack which will shake several of the architects of the European Union still in power, Mr Blair will tell them institutions they were constructing were "impossibly remote from the people".

The criticism comes as EU heads of state finalise details for a new treaty on EU reform, to be signed in under two weeks in Amsterdam.

Wim Kok, Prime Minister of the Netherlands, which holds the EU presidency, held out hope yesterday that consensus on the shape of the new treaty was now within reach. But Mr Blair will tell the Socialists today: "We must stop talking about European theology and start doing things from which real people see real benefits.

"Am I satisfied with Europe? Frankly, no."

The Prime Minister's address will be viewed in some quarters of Continental Europe as an unwarranted piece of lecturing by one of the Union's newest leaders. However, riding high on a wave of popularity after his landslide victory, Mr Blair's credentials as "a winner" have won him seemingly boundless goodwill.

Mr Blair clearly chose the Socialist Congress as the moment to try to take the reins in Europe at a time when a Socialist revival is being widely predicted. Lionel Jospin was swept to power as the new French Socialist Prime Minister this week.

Wary of much of the old Labour thinking still present in Mr Jospin's discourse, Mr Blair will take the chance to reject what he believes are "rigidities" and "inflexibilities" in favour of a Europe geared to "employability and job flexibility".

Much of the agenda matches New Labour economic policy at home. Mr Blair believes he is now in a position to sell his modernising message abroad, and will attempt to persuade other Europeans that their own countries are already moving towards his radical approach.

"Parties which seize this opportunity will be the parties of the future," will be his message.

The Prime Minister is also expected to admit that the previous Conservative government were correct in advocating labour market flexibility and an end to employment red tape. He will tell the conference: "The right got a lot wrong, but they were right about the need for flexible labour markets. What they got wrong was the failure to equip people with skills to adapt to change and they refused to see the need for minimum standards in the workforce."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in