Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Well-connected and wealthy: Bechtel wins from Saddam's demise

Andrew Gumbel
Saturday 24 May 2003 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Few companies represent the corporate face of the Bush administration quite like Bechtel of San Francisco. And few - Vice-President Dick Cheney's old company, Halliburton, is the only possible competitor - were quite so identified with the drive to overthrow Saddam Hussein, starting months before the US-led invasion began.

The point man from the earliest stages was George Schultz, a Bechtel board member and former secretary of state from the Reagan era. As chairman of the so-called Committee to Liberate Iraq, Mr Schultz was one of the biggest cheerleaders for war who argued both for the removal of Saddam Hussein and also the benefits of rebuilding Iraq after Saddam was gone. He never explicitly said his own company should be in charge of the reconstruction, but nobody much doubted that was what he meant.

Indeed, last month, Bechtel was awarded the primary contract - worth as much as $680m (£415m) in the first instance, but potentially much more lucrative given total reconstruction estimates as high as $100bn - to rebuild Iraq's water and electricity supplies, roads, schools, sewers and hospitals.

It was a closed-door process, with just six companies, all American, invited to put in bids. The man who picked Bechtel, Andrew Natsios of the US Agency for International Development, was well acquainted with the company: in his previous job, as head of the Massachusetts Turnpike Authority, he had worked with Bechtel on the so-called Big Dig - a massive project to bury a freeway in a tunnel beneath downtown Boston. In theory, the Big Dig should have been a reason to steer well clear of Bechtel. The project has dragged on for 18 years, and its cost has mushroomed from an initial $3.5bn to almost $15bn.

But political juice was clearly the deciding factor. Bechtel's chairman and chief executive, Riley Bechtel, was recently appointed to President Bush's export council. Jack Sheehan, a senior vice-president, is a member of the Defence Policy Board, the secretive Pentagon advisory council that lobbied hard for war in Iraq. Bechtel has made $1.3m in political donations over the past four years, 60 per cent to Republicans, according to the Centre for Responsive Politics, a Washington campaign watchdog.

Bechtel's political and military links go way back to the days when it was invited to build the Hoover Dam outside Las Vegas in conjunction with a leading defence contractor, and took a leading role in preparing the shipyards of San Francisco Bay for the Second World War.

The Reagan administration could almost have been subtitled "Bechtel Goes to Washington", with Mr Shultz as Secretary of State and another alumnus, Caspar Weinberger, as Secretary of Defence.

When Donald Rumsfeld, now the Pentagon supremo, went on his now-notorious trips to Baghdad in the early 1980s to cosy up to Saddam Hussein, one of his tasks was to promote a Bechtel project to build an oil pipeline from Iraq to Aqaba on the Red Sea. As revealed by recently declassified government documents, Saddam eventually said no to the pipeline - but the Rumsfeld-Bechtel relationship was firmly established and has now, clearly, been revived.

The choice of Bechtel to lead reconstruction efforts also points to the Bush administration's preference for private enterprise in public works projects, with taxpayers picking up the tab.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in