New charges for Israeli troops
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Israeli Supreme Court has ruled that the army must file more serious charges against soldiers filmed abusing a bound and blindfolded Palestinian prisoner last year.
The accused, an unnamed sergeant and his commanding officer, Lt Colonel Omri Borberg, were indicted on the relatively minor count of unbecoming conduct after the incident. They have not yet been tried.
The video released last year by Israeli rights group B'Tselem showed a soldier firing a rubber bullet toward the foot of a Palestinian held at a West Bank checkpoint. The sergeant said he was ordered to shoot; his commanding officer insisted he had not given such an order and that his intention was only to frighten the prisoner, whose toe was bruised by the bullet.
B'Tselem and other groups complained to the Supreme Court that the army was too lenient in its prosecution of the men. Michael Sfard, a lawyer for the rights groups, said the court's ruling yesterday did not state what charges the army must now bring.
"They don't have to indict him now on the most serious offence possible but they must change the indictment so that the most lenient charge is replaced with something more severe," he said. Mr Sfard said illegal use of a weapon or an assault charge were possible charges.
The army said that it respected the ruling.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments