Nato chief calls for caution over military strikes on Iraq
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Nato might support military action against Iraq if convincing evidence was found linking Saddam Hussein's regime to terrorism, the alliance's secretary general said yesterday.
But Lord Robertson of Port Ellen joined British ministers in playing down the prospect of early military strikes against Iraq. Although hawks in the Bush administration want to complete the "unfinished business" of the Gulf War, Tony Blair fears such action could break up the international coalition against terrorism forged after the 11 September attacks and has sided with the "doves" led by Colin Powell, the US Secretary of State.
Lord Robertson echoed Mr Blair's caution yesterday when he told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: "If more evidence comes forward and people are convinced by it then other courses of action may be embarked upon. But until that happens, I don't think people should jump to conclusions."
Lord Robertson, Britain's former defence secretary, said: "Clearly if there was evidence pointing towards Saddam Hussein being responsible in any way for the atrocities of September 11, or if it was found that he was harbouring people who were intimately connected with that, then I think the world would jump automatically to the conclusion that he represented a bigger threat.
"So far the Americans themselves have publicly said that they don't see evidence linking bin Laden to Saddam Hussein's regime. But if the evidence came forward, then I think the international community and Nato itself would want to look and examine that evidence and to work out what then should be done about it."
Lord Robertson rejected criticism that Nato had been sidelined in the war in Afghanistan, saying it was never going to be "the coalition of first choice" for the conflict. "Nato is still the cornerstone of European-Atlantic security and has provided invaluable political and indeed military support to the coalition so far," he said. "I don't think you should say that just because Nato has not been used as yet in Afghanistan that Nato's role has been diminished."
He said a combination of Nato and diplomacy by the European Union had prevented a civil war in Macedonia, and the organisation was "perfectly capable of rising to even bigger challenges".
Lord Robertson said he did not believe Russia would join Nato but predicted ever-closer links between the two.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments