Mosul dam could collapse with 'very little warning' and kill hundreds of thousands in its path
The US has said the area should be evacuated straight away
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A dam that could collapse with "very little warning" would potentially kill hundreds of thousands of people at a single stroke, US officials have warned.
Serious concerns around the stability of Iraq’s Mosul Dam have been raised, prompting the US to call for a prompt evacuation of the area.
A statement released by the US Embassy in Baghdad, warns the dam “faces a serious and unprecedented risk of catastrophic failure with little warning”.
The dam, previously called the Saddam Dam, is located on the Tigris River and is the largest in Iraq.
According to the embassy, there are between 500,000 and 1.5 million Iraqis living in the areas which would be at highest risk should the dam collapse.
It warns they would only survive the flood wave if they evacuated the area.
The US is said to be working in partnership with the Iraqi government’s ‘early warning and public information efforts’ regarding the structure.
Since the US says it has “no specific information that indicates when a breach might occur” it suggests - out of “an abundance of caution” - the best option is a “prompt evacuation”.
For people in Mosul, Tikrit and Samarra this would mean moving at least 5km from the river banks, although for those on the east side of the river in Samarra are advised to relocate further away, “around 16.5 km”.
The embassy warned large areas of Baghdad could also flood in the event of a dam collapse, potentially including the international airport.
Aside from the immediate mortality threat, a breach could mean as many as 6 million residents would be “adversely affected”.
The embassy cited “dislocation, increased health hazards, limited to no mobility, and losses of homes, buildings, and services” among the possibilities.
It also said the potential flood would destroy power plants, and damage significant areas of irrigated agriculture.
Iraqi officials have played down the threat posed by the dam.
The Wall Street Journal reported Mehdi Rashid, and adviser to the country’s water-resources minister as saying: “The dam has had a problem since 1986. This is not a new subject.
“The safety of the Mosul Dam is on the back of the government. The ministry has been working on it.”
Earlier in the month, Reuters said the water minister himself, Mushin al-Shammari, told al-Sumaria TV: "The looming danger to Mosul dam is one in a thousand. This risk level is present in all the world's dams."
Nonetheless, the US welcomed the commitment from Iraq prime minister Haider al-Abadi to finalise plans to address the problem.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments