Israel's new army chief led Gaza war
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Israel named a new army chief yesterday, choosing a general who led troops in its Gaza war to face future challenges that could include a nuclear Iran and missile threats from Islamist militants.
Ehud Barak, the Defence Minister, announced that he had picked Major-General Yoav Galant as chief of staff, a decision that came several weeks earlier than expected after a scandal erupted over alleged lobbying for the position.
As head of Israel's Southern Command, Major-General Galant led forces in the December 2008-January 2009 Gaza war on Islamist militants in which some 1,400 Palestinians and 13 Israelis were killed. A United Nations inquiry later accused both Hamas, which runs the Gaza Strip, and Israel of war crimes, but levelled most of its criticism at Israel.
The choice of a successor to the current army chief, Lieutenant-General Gabi Ashkenazi, due to step down in February, has been clouded by scandal. Allegations that Major-General Galant had hired a publicist to smear a rival candidate for the post has dominated Israeli headlines. Police said that the accusations were not true and a document at the heart of the affair was a fake.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments