Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

UN condemns Israel for 'threatening peace' with first new settlement in occupied West Bank for two decades

Secretary-General 'condemns all unilateral actions that threaten peace'

Michelle Nichols,Maayan Lubell
Saturday 01 April 2017 08:30 BST
Benjamin Netanyahu pledged to house Jewish families evicted from the illegal settlement of Amona
Benjamin Netanyahu pledged to house Jewish families evicted from the illegal settlement of Amona (Reuters)

Your support helps us to tell the story

This election is still a dead heat, according to most polls. In a fight with such wafer-thin margins, we need reporters on the ground talking to the people Trump and Harris are courting. Your support allows us to keep sending journalists to the story.

The Independent is trusted by 27 million Americans from across the entire political spectrum every month. Unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock you out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. But quality journalism must still be paid for.

Help us keep bring these critical stories to light. Your support makes all the difference.

The United Nations Secretary-General has said he is is disappointed and alarmed by Israel's decision to build a new settlement on land the Palestinians seek for a state and has condemned the move.

Israel's security cabinet approved the construction of the first new settlement in the occupied West Bank in two decades on Thursday, even as Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu negotiates with Washington on a possible curb of settlement activity.

“Antonio Guterres condemns all unilateral actions that, like the present one, threaten peace and undermine the two-state solution,” UN spokesman Stephane Dujarric said.

The White House appeared more accommodating to Israel's plans for the new settlement, intended for some 40 Jewish families evicted from Amona, a West Bank outpost razed in February because it was built on private Palestinian land.

A White House official noted Mr Netanyahu had made a commitment to the Amona settlers before he agreed to work on limiting settlement activity with Donald Trump.

The US President, who had been widely seen in Israel as sympathetic towards settlements, appeared to surprise Mr Netanyahu during a White House visit last month, when he urged him to “hold back on settlements for a little bit.”

Barack Obama uses final interview as President to slam Israeli policy on settlements

The two then agreed that their aides would try to work out a compromise on how much Israel can build and where.

“The Israeli government has made clear that Israel's intent is to adopt a policy regarding settlement activity that takes President Trump's concerns into consideration,” a written statement from the official said.

Following Thursday's announcement, Israeli officials said Mr Netanyahu's security cabinet decided out of respect for Mr Trump's peace efforts to limit construction in settlements to existing, built-up areas and not to expand beyond present boundaries.

The White House was informed in advance about the planned announcement of a new settlement as well as the Israeli policy shift and raised no objections, a person close to the matter said, signalling possible coordination between the two governments.

US and Israeli officials completed a round of talks on the settlements last week without agreement, saying the discussions were ongoing, and the two sides have yet to announce any final understanding on the issue.

Mr Trump's Middle East envoy, Jason Greenblatt, this week wrapped up a second trip to the region aimed at reviving peace talks that collapsed in 2014.

Palestinians want the West Bank and East Jerusalem for their own state, along with the Gaza Strip.

Most countries view Israeli settlement activity as illegal and an obstacle to peace. Israel disagrees, citing biblical and historical ties to the land it captured in the 1967 war, as well as security concerns.

The UN Security Council adopted a resolution in December that demanded a halt to settlement building, after the Obama administration decided to abstain from the vote instead of vetoing the moving.

Sweden's UN Ambassador Olof Skoog, a member of the Security Council, said the 15-member Security Council should respond to the latest announcement by Israel on settlements.

“The urgency of the situation and the deterioration on the ground might call for some sort of Security Council action, although we know that finding unity on this is not easy,” he told reporters.

Reuters

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in